IUSB ranks 2nd and WABF 76th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
IUSB vs WABF
IUSB −0.29pt a year
0.06%0.35%
IUSB 1742.2×the volume
6.13M3.52K
WABF +0.3pt
+5.8%+6.1%
IUSB vs WABF Performance
0.0%−0.9%
- IUSB 0.06%, better
- WABF 0.35%
- IUSB $50.2B
- WABF $12M
- IUSB 0.0%, better
- WABF −0.9%
- IUSB 4.32%
- WABF 5.54%, better
- IUSB 18280
- WABF 391
- IUSB 6.13M sh, better
- WABF 3.52K sh
- IUSB $44.91
- WABF $24.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IUSB | WABF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | C46 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A93 |
| Risk | C54Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | A89Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | C42 |
| Durability | A94Higher | C42 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. IUSB and WABF are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IUSBA
WABFC
In short
IUSB Most core bond funds stop at investment grade. IUSB keeps going, folding high-yield USD debt into the same wrapper across roughly 18,000 bonds, for 0.06% a year.
WABF Western Asset has run bond money since 1971, and WABF is that core-plus playbook in ETF form: an actively picked book of roughly 400 US bonds, paid out monthly, with room to reach into high yield.
Stated mandate
IUSB The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated bonds spanning investment-grade and high-yield sectors.
WABF The Fund seeks to maximize total return while maintaining prudent investment management and meeting liquidity needs.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IUSB vs WABF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IUSB vs WABF Cost
Overpaying WABF vs IUSB
$5,856
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IUSB 0.06%
$1,270
WABF 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IUSB | WABF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $634 | $524 |
| 20 | $432 | $2,454 | $2,022 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $7,126 | $5,856 |
- 0.06%IUSB, cheaper
- 0.35%WABF
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
IUSB 10th cheapest of 114 funds
WABF 60th cheapest of 114 funds
IUSB vs WABF Dividends
- IUSB 4.32%
- WABF 5.54%, better
- IUSB $1.94
- WABF $1.33
- IUSB $0.15
- WABF $0.13
- IUSB Oct 1, 2026
- WABF Oct 1, 2026
- IUSB Oct 6, 2026
- WABF Oct 6, 2026
- IUSB Monthly
- WABF Monthly
Distribution history
IUSB vs WABF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IUSB 5.5%, betterWABF 6.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- IUSB 0.25WABF 0.25Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- IUSB −17.4%WABF −5.3%
- Market sensitivity
- IUSB 0.96WABF 0.30
IUSB and WABF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
