AGG ranks 1st and WABF 76th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
AGG vs WABF
AGG −0.32pt a year
0.03%0.35%
AGG 2829.5×the volume
9.95M3.52K
WABF +0.7pt
+5.4%+6.1%
AGG vs WABF Performance
−0.2%−0.9%
- AGG 0.03%, better
- WABF 0.35%
- AGG $140B
- WABF $12M
- AGG −0.2%, better
- WABF −0.9%
- AGG 4.12%
- WABF 5.54%, better
- AGG 13428
- WABF 391
- AGG 9.95M sh, better
- WABF 3.52K sh
- AGG $96.45
- WABF $24.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AGG | WABF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | C46 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A93 |
| Risk | C47Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | A77Higher | C42 |
| Durability | A95Higher | C42 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. AGG and WABF are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AGGA
WABFC
In short
AGG Launched in 2003, one of the first funds to pack the entire U.S. investment-grade bond market into a single ticker: Treasuries, corporates and mortgage bonds, three basis points a year, cash paid monthly.
WABF Western Asset has run bond money since 1971, and WABF is that core-plus playbook in ETF form: an actively picked book of roughly 400 US bonds, paid out monthly, with room to reach into high yield.
Stated mandate
AGG The fund seeks to track the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, providing broad exposure to the total U.S. investment-grade bond market.
WABF The Fund seeks to maximize total return while maintaining prudent investment management and meeting liquidity needs.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AGG vs WABF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AGG vs WABF Cost
Overpaying WABF vs AGG
$6,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AGG 0.03%
$638
WABF 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AGG | WABF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $634 | $579 |
| 20 | $216 | $2,454 | $2,238 |
| 30 | $638 | $7,126 | $6,488 |
- 0.03%AGG, cheaper
- 0.35%WABF
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
AGG 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
WABF 60th cheapest of 114 funds
AGG vs WABF Dividends
- AGG 4.12%
- WABF 5.54%, better
- AGG $3.97
- WABF $1.33
- AGG $0.33
- WABF $0.13
- AGG Oct 1, 2026
- WABF Oct 1, 2026
- AGG Oct 6, 2026
- WABF Oct 6, 2026
- AGG Monthly
- WABF Monthly
Distribution history
AGG vs WABF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AGG 5.6%, betterWABF 6.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- AGG 0.17WABF 0.25, better
- Worst fall
- AGG −17.3%WABF −5.3%
- Market sensitivity
- AGG 0.99WABF 0.30
AGG and WABF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





