IUSB ranks 2nd and ZHOG 87th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
IUSB vs ZHOG
IUSB −0.37pt a year
0.06%0.43%
IUSB 3553.2×the volume
6.13M1.72K
IUSB vs ZHOG Performance
−0.4%+0.8%
- IUSB 0.06%, better
- ZHOG 0.43%
- IUSB $50.2B
- ZHOG $45M
- IUSB 0.0%
- ZHOG
- IUSB 4.32%
- ZHOG 5.58%, better
- IUSB 18280
- ZHOG 63
- IUSB 6.13M sh, better
- ZHOG 1.72K sh
- IUSB $44.91
- ZHOG $50.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IUSB | ZHOG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | D28 |
| Mission | A100Higher | B66 |
| Risk | C54 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | A89Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | D37 |
| Durability | A94Higher | C41 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. IUSB and ZHOG are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IUSBA
ZHOGC
In short
IUSB Most core bond funds stop at investment grade. IUSB keeps going, folding high-yield USD debt into the same wrapper across roughly 18,000 bonds, for 0.06% a year.
ZHOG A go-anywhere active bond fund in a category ruled by index trackers. F/m's team roams U.S. fixed income for relative value, keeps duration short and average credit quality investment grade, and pays monthly. Fee: 0.43%, no waiver.
Stated mandate
IUSB The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated bonds spanning investment-grade and high-yield sectors.
ZHOG The Fund seeks attractive income by identifying undervalued and opportunistic sectors and securities in U.S. fixed-income markets, while generally limiting duration and maintaining average investment-grade credit quality.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IUSB vs ZHOG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IUSB vs ZHOG Cost
Overpaying ZHOG vs IUSB
$7,392
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IUSB 0.06%
$1,270
ZHOG 0.43%
$8,662
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IUSB | ZHOG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $776 | $666 |
| 20 | $432 | $2,994 | $2,562 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $8,662 | $7,392 |
- 0.06%IUSB, cheaper
- 0.43%ZHOG
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
IUSB 10th cheapest of 114 funds
ZHOG 82nd cheapest of 114 funds
IUSB vs ZHOG Dividends
- IUSB 4.32%
- ZHOG 5.58%, better
- IUSB $1.94
- ZHOG $2.80
- IUSB $0.15
- ZHOG $0.22
- IUSB Oct 1, 2026
- ZHOG Oct 27, 2026
- IUSB Oct 6, 2026
- ZHOG Oct 28, 2026
- IUSB Monthly
- ZHOG Monthly
Distribution history
IUSB vs ZHOG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IUSB 5.5%ZHOG
- Return per unit of risk
- IUSB 0.25ZHOG
- Worst fall
- IUSB −17.4%ZHOG
- Market sensitivity
- IUSB 0.96ZHOG 0.24
IUSB and ZHOG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.43% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.43% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.43% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
