IVVW ranks 3rd and PHEQ 10th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
IVVW vs PHEQ
IVVW −0.04pt a year
0.25%0.29%
IVVW 2.0×the volume
38.2K18.9K
IVVW vs PHEQ Performance
+13.4%+9.9%
- IVVW 0.25%, better
- PHEQ 0.29%
- IVVW $338M
- PHEQ $149M
- IVVW +13.4%, better
- PHEQ +9.9%
- IVVW 18.52%, better
- PHEQ 0.83%
- IVVW 506
- PHEQ 181
- IVVW 38.2K sh, better
- PHEQ 18.9K sh
- IVVW $42.84
- PHEQ $34.67
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IVVW | PHEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A89 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C54 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | C49Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | A73Higher | B63 |
| Durability | A72Higher | B56 |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. IVVW and PHEQ are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IVVWA
PHEQA
In short
IVVW BlackRock's version of the covered call: hold the whole S&P 500 through the iShares Core fund, sell one-month index calls struck 1% out of the money, pay the premium out monthly. All for a quarter-point fee.
PHEQ A hedged large-cap core that skips the outcome calendar. Parametric layers a ladder of put spreads and short calls over U.S. stocks, so the hedge rolls through the year instead of resetting on one annual date.
Stated mandate
IVVW The fund seeks to track an index strategy that holds the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and sells one-month call options primarily on the S&P 500 Index to generate income. The short option position is intended to be offset by the fund’s long position in the underlying ETF.
PHEQ Seeks capital appreciation up to a cap while limiting investor losses through a downside buffer. It invests in U.S. large-cap equities and uses laddered put spreads and short calls to create buffer-cap structures.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IVVW vs PHEQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IVVW vs PHEQ Cost
Overpaying PHEQ vs IVVW
$793
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IVVW 0.25%
$5,159
PHEQ 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IVVW | PHEQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $527 | $72 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $2,044 | $275 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $5,952 | $793 |
- 0.25%IVVW, cheaper
- 0.29%PHEQ
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
IVVW 2nd cheapest of 51 funds
PHEQ 5th cheapest of 51 funds
IVVW vs PHEQ Dividends
- IVVW 18.52%, better
- PHEQ 0.83%
- IVVW $8.10
- PHEQ $0.29
- IVVW $0.58
- PHEQ $0.05
- IVVW Nov 3, 2026
- PHEQ Sep 21, 2026
- IVVW Nov 6, 2026
- PHEQ Sep 25, 2026
- IVVW Monthly
- PHEQ Quarterly
Distribution history
IVVW vs PHEQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IVVW 7.3%PHEQ 6.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- IVVW 1.10PHEQ 1.46
- Worst fall
- IVVW −16.8%PHEQ −12.6%
- Market sensitivity
- IVVW 0.54PHEQ 0.51
IVVW and PHEQ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
