IVVW ranks 3rd and XDTE 37th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
IVVW vs XDTE
IVVW −0.72pt a year
0.25%0.97%
XDTE 4.0×the volume
38.2K155K
IVVW vs XDTE Performance
+13.4%+13.0%
- IVVW 0.25%, better
- XDTE 0.97%
- IVVW $338M
- XDTE $307M
- IVVW +13.4%, better
- XDTE +13.0%
- IVVW 18.52%
- XDTE 29.86%, better
- IVVW 506
- XDTE 4
- IVVW 38.2K sh
- XDTE 155K sh, better
- IVVW $42.84
- XDTE $36.46
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IVVW | XDTE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F8 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A75 |
| Risk | C54Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | C49 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A73Higher | C41 |
| Durability | A72Higher | B59 |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. IVVW and XDTE are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IVVWA
XDTEC
In short
IVVW BlackRock's version of the covered call: hold the whole S&P 500 through the iShares Core fund, sell one-month index calls struck 1% out of the money, pay the premium out monthly. All for a quarter-point fee.
XDTE The original 0DTE covered call fund. It sells same-day S&P 500 calls each morning and lets them expire at the close, capping the trading session while leaving the overnight stretch uncapped. Pays weekly.
Stated mandate
IVVW The fund seeks to track an index strategy that holds the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and sells one-month call options primarily on the S&P 500 Index to generate income. The short option position is intended to be offset by the fund’s long position in the underlying ETF.
XDTE The Fund's primary objective is current income and its secondary objective is capital appreciation. It uses a synthetic covered-call strategy to provide weekly income while maintaining exposure to the S&P 500 Index's price return.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IVVW vs XDTE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IVVW vs XDTE Cost
Overpaying XDTE vs IVVW
$13,039
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IVVW 0.25%
$5,159
XDTE 0.97%
$18,198
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IVVW | XDTE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $1,712 | $1,257 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $6,443 | $4,674 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $18,198 | $13,039 |
- 0.25%IVVW, cheaper
- 0.97%XDTE
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
IVVW 2nd cheapest of 51 funds
XDTE 46th cheapest of 51 funds
IVVW vs XDTE Dividends
- IVVW 18.52%
- XDTE 29.86%, better
- IVVW $8.10
- XDTE $11.10
- IVVW $0.58
- XDTE $0.11
- IVVW Nov 3, 2026
- XDTE Nov 5, 2026
- IVVW Nov 6, 2026
- XDTE Nov 6, 2026
- IVVW Monthly
- XDTE Weekly
Distribution history
IVVW vs XDTE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IVVW 7.3%XDTE 11.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- IVVW 1.10XDTE 0.85
- Worst fall
- IVVW −16.8%XDTE −19.0%
- Market sensitivity
- IVVW 0.54XDTE 0.91
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.