SPYG ranks 1st and IVW 12th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IVW vs SPYG
SPYG −0.14pt a year
0.18%0.04%
SPYG 1.4×the volume
1.67M2.28M
SPYG +0.2pt
+17.3%+17.5%
IVW vs SPYG Performance
+72.2%+73.4%
- IVW 0.18%
- SPYG 0.04%, better
- IVW $74.7B
- SPYG $55.5B
- IVW +8.2%
- SPYG +8.3%, better
- IVW 0.36%
- SPYG 0.50%, better
- IVW 154
- SPYG 154
- IVW 1.67M sh
- SPYG 2.28M sh, better
- IVW $134.44
- SPYG $119.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IVW | SPYG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C49 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A98 | A98 |
| Risk | B62 | B62 |
| Tradability | A72 | A95Higher |
| Holdings | D37 | D38Higher |
| Durability | A84Higher | A79 |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IVW and SPYG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IVWB
SPYGA
In short
IVW The 2000-vintage original for S&P 500 growth exposure: roughly 150 large caps chosen by a three-factor rules screen, cap-weighted, no manager discretion. Big and liquid, though cheaper trackers of the same benchmark now exist.
SPYG The growth half of the S&P 500 for 0.04% a year, running since 2000. No exotic screen, no reinvention: just the index's fastest-growing names, in the cheapest wrapper tracking that index.
Stated mandate
IVW The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large-cap stocks exhibiting strong growth characteristics, selected using measures including earnings and revenue growth.
SPYG The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P 500 Growth Index. It provides exposure to S&P 500 companies selected for strong growth characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IVW vs SPYG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IVW vs SPYG Cost
Overpaying IVW vs SPYG
$2,900
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IVW 0.18%
$3,749
SPYG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IVW | SPYG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $73 | $255 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $288 | $993 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $849 | $2,900 |
- 0.18%IVW
- 0.04%SPYG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
SPYG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
IVW 17th cheapest of 35 funds
IVW vs SPYG Dividends
- IVW 0.36%
- SPYG 0.50%, better
- IVW $0.49
- SPYG $0.59
- IVW $0.13
- SPYG $0.15
- IVW Sep 15, 2026
- SPYG Sep 21, 2026
- IVW Sep 18, 2026
- SPYG Sep 23, 2026
- IVW Quarterly
- SPYG Quarterly
Distribution history
IVW vs SPYG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IVW
- SPYG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IVW 16.5%SPYG 16.5%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- IVW 1.27SPYG 1.28, better
- Worst fall
- IVW −32.7%SPYG −32.7%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- IVW 1.17SPYG 1.17Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
IVW and SPYG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


