SCHG ranks 2nd and IVW 12th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IVW vs SCHG
SCHG −0.14pt a year
0.18%0.04%
SCHG 4.5×the volume
1.67M7.59M
SCHG +1.2pt
+17.3%+18.5%
IVW vs SCHG Performance
+72.2%+74.3%
- IVW 0.18%
- SCHG 0.04%, better
- IVW $74.7B
- SCHG $61.7B
- IVW +8.2%, better
- SCHG +3.3%
- IVW 0.36%
- SCHG 0.40%, better
- IVW 154
- SCHG 187
- IVW 1.67M sh
- SCHG 7.59M sh, better
- IVW $134.44
- SCHG $34.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IVW | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C49 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A98Higher | A92 |
| Risk | B62Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | A72 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | D37Higher | D36 |
| Durability | A84Higher | A75 |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IVW and SCHG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IVWB
SCHGA
In short
IVW The 2000-vintage original for S&P 500 growth exposure: roughly 150 large caps chosen by a three-factor rules screen, cap-weighted, no manager discretion. Big and liquid, though cheaper trackers of the same benchmark now exist.
SCHG Schwab's growth workhorse: roughly 200 large-cap U.S. growth names for four basis points, one of the cheapest tickets in a crowded category. Running since 2009 and among the most heavily traded growth funds around.
Stated mandate
IVW The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large-cap stocks exhibiting strong growth characteristics, selected using measures including earnings and revenue growth.
SCHG SCHG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in stocks included in that index, which represents large-cap U.S. growth equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IVW vs SCHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IVW vs SCHG Cost
Overpaying IVW vs SCHG
$2,900
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IVW 0.18%
$3,749
SCHG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IVW | SCHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $73 | $255 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $288 | $993 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $849 | $2,900 |
- 0.18%IVW
- 0.04%SCHG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
SCHG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
IVW 17th cheapest of 35 funds
IVW vs SCHG Dividends
- IVW 0.36%
- SCHG 0.40%, better
- IVW $0.49
- SCHG $0.14
- IVW $0.13
- SCHG $0.04
- IVW Sep 15, 2026
- SCHG Sep 23, 2026
- IVW Sep 18, 2026
- SCHG Sep 28, 2026
- IVW Quarterly
- SCHG Quarterly
Distribution history
IVW vs SCHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IVW
- SCHG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IVW 16.5%SCHG 16.5%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- IVW 1.27, betterSCHG 1.16
- Worst fall
- IVW −32.7%, betterSCHG −34.6%
- Market sensitivity
- IVW 1.17SCHG 1.20
IVW and SCHG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


