IWD ranks 4th and MVAL 37th of 40 funds in the US Value Index Category.
IWD vs MVAL
8.6%by weight
IWD −0.32pt a year
0.18%0.50%
IWD 4143.7×the volume
2.01M484
IWD vs MVAL Performance
+28.4%+13.7%
- IWD 0.18%, better
- MVAL 0.50%
- IWD $83.2B
- MVAL $3M
- IWD +28.4%, better
- MVAL +13.7%
- IWD 1.37%
- MVAL 1.60%, better
- IWD 874
- MVAL 40
- IWD 2.01M sh, better
- MVAL 484 sh
- IWD $258.68
- MVAL $39.53
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWD | MVAL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59Higher | F18 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A74 |
| Risk | A79Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | A96Higher | D33 |
| Holdings | C42Higher | F22 |
| Durability | A82Higher | F12 |
Rank among US Value Index funds
Same Category. IWD and MVAL are both graded against the same 40 US Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWDA
MVALD
In short
IWD The original Russell 1000 Value tracker, live since 2000 and still one of the most traded ways to own the value half of US large caps. Roughly 900 stocks, followed closely, at a price that reflects the plumbing.
Stated mandate
IWD The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks that may be undervalued relative to comparable companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWD vs MVAL Holdings
How IWD and MVAL differ
8.6%
Shared holdings make up 91.1% of MVAL and 10.1% of IWD.
Level by level
- Holdings8.6%
- Sector63.4%
- Country98.8%
Sector
| Sector | More in IWDMore in MVAL | IWD | MVAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer Staples | MVAL +23.2 points | 7.6% | 30.8% |
| Financials | IWD +12.7 points | 18.3% | 5.6% |
| Technology | IWD +6.9 points | 20.2% | 13.3% |
| Energy | IWD +6.7 points | 6.7% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | MVAL +5.0 points | 13.5% | 18.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | MVAL +4.2 points | 10.2% | 14.4% |
| Utilities | IWD +3.5 points | 3.5% | 0.0% |
| Materials | IWD +3.5 points | 3.5% | 0.0% |
| Real Estate | IWD +3.3 points | 3.3% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | MVAL +3.2 points | 10.5% | 13.7% |
| Communication | MVAL +0.8 points | 2.9% | 3.7% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in IWDMore in MVAL | IWD | MVAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brazil | MVAL +1.2 points | 0.0% | 1.2% |
| Other countries (10) | IWD +1.2 points | 100.0% | 98.8% |
Concentration
- IWD29.3%
- MVAL43.8%
- IWD871
- MVAL39
Asset class
- IWD
- Equity
- MVAL
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in IWD838
- In both33
- Only in MVAL6
Only in IWD
838 securities, 89.7% of IWD by weight
- Apple6.03%
- Amazon.com Inc5.64%
- Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B2.67%
- JPMorgan Chase & Co2.38%
- Exxonmobil Holdings Corp2.04%
- Johnson & Johnson1.74%
- Walmart1.31%
- AbbVie1.27%
- Chevron1.15%
- Cisco Systems Inc1.09%
- Procter & Gamble0.99%
- Merck & Co Inc0.98%
- UnitedHealth Group0.97%
- Philip Morris International0.86%
- Coca-Cola0.85%
- Bank of America0.80%
- Intel Corporation0.79%
- Rtx0.71%
- Thermo Fisher Scientific0.68%
- Goldman Sachs Group0.68%
- Costco Wholesale Corp0.67%
- Wells Fargo0.67%
- International Business Machines Co0.64%
- Linde PLC0.63%
- Gilead Sciences0.56%
- Morgan Stanley0.55%
- Walt Disney0.51%
- Conocophillips0.50%
- Verizon Communications Inc0.49%
- Abbott Laboratories0.49%
- Mcdonalds Corp0.48%
- Salesforce0.48%
- BlackRock0.46%
- Nextera Energy0.46%
- Qualcomm0.46%
- Pfizer0.46%
- Citigroup0.46%
- Welltower0.45%
- Union Pacific0.44%
- Deere0.44%
- Accenture PLC Class A0.42%
- AT&T0.38%
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals0.38%
- Progressive0.36%
- Altria Group Inc0.34%
- Chubb0.34%
- Capital One Financial Corp0.33%
- Eaton PLC0.32%
- Prologis Reit0.32%
- American Express0.31%
Only in MVAL
6 securities, 8.6% of MVAL by weight
- Lockheed Martin Corp2.61%
- Booking Holdings Inc1.83%
- Texas Instruments Inc1.42%
- Mercadolibre Inc1.18%
- Nxp Semiconductors Nv0.78%
- Alphabet Inc0.78%
Weight gaps
All 33 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in IWDMore in MVAL | IWD | MVAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ge Healthcare Technologies | MVAL +4.62 points | 0.09% | 4.71% |
| Danaher | MVAL +4.61 points | 0.39% | 5.00% |
| Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc | MVAL +4.53 points | 0.05% | 4.58% |
| Kenvue | MVAL +4.34 points | 0.10% | 4.44% |
| Brown Forman Class B | MVAL +4.33 points | 0.01% | 4.34% |
| Zimmer Biomet Holdings | MVAL +4.29 points | 0.05% | 4.34% |
| Tractor Supply | MVAL +4.22 points | 0.05% | 4.27% |
| Mondelez International Class A | MVAL +3.97 points | 0.22% | 4.19% |
| Constellation Brands Class A | MVAL +3.93 points | 0.05% | 3.98% |
| Clorox | MVAL +3.85 points | 0.03% | 3.88% |
| Mccormick & Co Non-Voting | MVAL +3.84 points | 0.03% | 3.87% |
| Nike Class B | MVAL +3.78 points | 0.12% | 3.90% |
| Otis Worldwide | MVAL +2.79 points | 0.08% | 2.87% |
| Masco | MVAL +2.72 points | 0.04% | 2.76% |
| Zoetis Inc Class A | MVAL +2.42 points | 0.02% | 2.44% |
| Charles Schwab | MVAL +2.13 points | 0.35% | 2.48% |
| Campbell Soup | MVAL +2.10 points | 0.01% | 2.11% |
| Meta Platforms Class A | MVAL +2.07 points | 0.65% | 2.72% |
| Lowes Companies Inc | MVAL +1.87 points | 0.31% | 2.18% |
| Bristol Myers Squibb | MVAL +1.84 points | 0.34% | 2.18% |
| Huntington Ingalls Industries | MVAL +1.77 points | 0.03% | 1.80% |
| Marketaxess Holdings | MVAL +1.51 points | 0.02% | 1.53% |
| Microsoft | IWD +1.48 points | 5.12% | 3.64% |
| Copart Inc | MVAL +1.44 points | 0.07% | 1.51% |
| Pepsico | MVAL +1.44 points | 0.44% | 1.88% |
| Allegion PLC | MVAL +1.42 points | 0.04% | 1.46% |
| Hershey Foods | MVAL +1.15 points | 0.06% | 1.21% |
| S&P Global | MVAL +1.15 points | 0.36% | 1.51% |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | MVAL +1.02 points | 0.20% | 1.22% |
| Dominos Pizza | MVAL +0.92 points | 0.03% | 0.95% |
| Jack Henry and Associates Inc | MVAL +0.89 points | 0.03% | 0.92% |
| Synopsys | MVAL +0.81 points | 0.23% | 1.04% |
| Analog Devices | MVAL +0.69 points | 0.50% | 1.19% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWD vs MVAL Cost
Overpaying MVAL vs IWD
$6,230
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWD 0.18%
$3,749
MVAL 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWD | MVAL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $900 | $572 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $3,460 | $2,179 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $9,979 | $6,230 |
- 0.18%IWD, cheaper
- 0.50%MVAL
- Middle half of US Value Index funds
- Median 0.20%
IWD 16th cheapest of 40 funds
MVAL 33rd cheapest of 40 funds
IWD vs MVAL Dividends
- IWD 1.37%
- MVAL 1.60%, better
- IWD $3.53
- MVAL $0.63
- IWD $0.93
- MVAL $0.63
- IWD Sep 15, 2026
- MVAL Dec 22, 2025
- IWD Sep 18, 2026
- MVAL Dec 26, 2025
- IWD Quarterly
- MVAL Annual
Distribution history
IWD vs MVAL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWD 12.1%MVAL 13.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IWD 1.42MVAL 0.54
- Worst fall
- IWD −19.0%MVAL −19.6%
- Market sensitivity
- IWD 0.85MVAL 0.62
IWD and MVAL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





