VUG ranks 5th and IWF 14th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IWF vs VUG
VUG −0.15pt a year
0.18%0.03%
VUG 1.4×the volume
4.51M6.32M
VUG +0.1pt
+17.5%+17.6%
IWF vs VUG Performance
+62.2%+67.0%
- IWF 0.18%
- VUG 0.03%, better
- IWF $120B
- VUG $392B
- IWF −2.8%
- VUG +2.7%, better
- IWF 0.37%
- VUG 0.41%, better
- IWF 375
- VUG 136
- IWF 4.51M sh
- VUG 6.32M sh, better
- IWF $117.59
- VUG $85.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWF | VUG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C49 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A99 |
| Risk | D29 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | A96Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | C43Higher | D29 |
| Durability | A86 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IWF and VUG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWFB
VUGA
In short
IWF Trading since 2000, IWF is the heavyweight way to own the Russell 1000 Growth Index: roughly 400 US large- and mid-cap growth names, in one of the biggest and busiest funds in its group. Cheaper clones of the same index exist.
VUG Three basis points buys roughly 170 US large-cap growth names. Running since 2004, over $100 billion in assets, and it tracks its index about as closely as an index fund can.
Stated mandate
IWF The Fund seeks to follow the Russell 1000 Growth Index, representing U.S. large- and mid-capitalization equities selected for growth characteristics. It generally invests at least 80% of assets in index components.
VUG The fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of large-capitalization growth stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWF vs VUG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWF vs VUG Cost
Overpaying IWF vs VUG
$3,111
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWF 0.18%
$3,749
VUG 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWF | VUG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $55 | $273 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $216 | $1,065 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $638 | $3,111 |
- 0.18%IWF
- 0.03%VUG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
VUG cheapest of 35 funds
IWF 17th cheapest of 35 funds
IWF vs VUG Dividends
- IWF 0.37%
- VUG 0.41%, better
- IWF $0.43
- VUG $0.35
- IWF $0.11
- VUG $0.09
- IWF Sep 15, 2026
- VUG Sep 28, 2026
- IWF Sep 18, 2026
- VUG Sep 30, 2026
- IWF Quarterly
- VUG Quarterly
Distribution history
IWF vs VUG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IWF
- VUG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWF 16.8%, betterVUG 17.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- IWF 1.01VUG 1.11, better
- Worst fall
- IWF −32.7%, betterVUG −35.6%
- Market sensitivity
- IWF 1.17VUG 1.23
IWF and VUG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





