Skip to content

IWF vs SCHG

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF

IWFBNYSE Arca

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

SCHGANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SCHG −0.14pt a year

IWF0.18%SCHG0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

SCHG 1.7×the volume

IWF4.51MSCHG7.59M

10Y return · a year

SCHG +1.0pt

IWF+17.5%SCHG+18.5%

IWF vs SCHG Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+62.2%IWF+74.3%SCHG

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. IWF +62.2%. SCHG +74.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%25%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IWF 0.18%
SCHG 0.04%, better
Fund size
IWF $120B
SCHG $61.7B
1Y total return
IWF −2.8%
SCHG +3.3%, better
Yield (12M)
IWF 0.37%
SCHG 0.40%, better
Holdings
IWF 375
SCHG 187
Avg volume (30D)
IWF 4.51M sh
SCHG 7.59M sh, better
NAV per share
IWF $117.59
SCHG $34.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IWF: Cost 49, Risk 29, Mission 100, Tradability 96, Holdings 43, Durability 86. SCHG: Cost 96, Risk 41, Mission 92, Tradability 87, Holdings 36, Durability 75.
Pillar letters and Scores for IWF, SCHG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIWFSCHG
Cost30% weightC49A96Higher
Mission25% weightA100HigherA92
Risk15% weightD29C41Higher
Tradability15% weightA96HigherA87
Holdings10% weightC43HigherD36
Durability5% weightA86HigherA75

Rank among US Growth Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IWF and SCHG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Growth Index⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

SCHG ranks 2nd and IWF 14th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYGState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AILCGiShares Morningstar Growth ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 2AIMCGiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  4. Rank 2ASCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  5. Rank 5AVUGVanguard Morningstar Growth ETFScore 77
  6. Rank 12BVOOGVanguard S&P 500 Growth ETFScore 67
  7. Rank 14BIWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETFScore 66
  8. Rank 14BVTWGVanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETFScore 66

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IWFBiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF

SCHGASchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

In short

IWF Trading since 2000, IWF is the heavyweight way to own the Russell 1000 Growth Index: roughly 400 US large- and mid-cap growth names, in one of the biggest and busiest funds in its group. Cheaper clones of the same index exist.

SCHG Schwab's growth workhorse: roughly 200 large-cap U.S. growth names for four basis points, one of the cheapest tickets in a crowded category. Running since 2009 and among the most heavily traded growth funds around.

Stated mandate

IWF The Fund seeks to follow the Russell 1000 Growth Index, representing U.S. large- and mid-capitalization equities selected for growth characteristics. It generally invests at least 80% of assets in index components.

SCHG SCHG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in stocks included in that index, which represents large-cap U.S. growth equities.

Why people hold it

  • IWF Running since 2000 and now among the largest and most actively traded growth ETFs, so getting in and out rarely means fighting a wide spread.
  • The mandate is plain: follow the Russell 1000 Growth Index, at least 80% in index components. Its index tracking measures among the tightest in its peer group.ishares.com
  • One ticker buys about 400 US large- and mid-cap stocks selected for growth characteristics, with cash paid out quarterly.
  • SCHG 0.04% a year against a growth-category median of 0.18%. Costs sit near the floor of the group.
  • Hews closely to the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, one of the tighter index implementations in its peer group.
  • Live since 2009, a multi-billion-dollar fund, and one of the busier tickers in the growth aisle, so entering and exiting is usually cheap and easy.
  • The benchmark is carved out of a total-market growth index, not S&P 500 membership, so a stock does not need an index committee's nod to qualify.

Worth knowing

  • IWF The 0.18% fee sits mid-pack for growth ETFs, and VONG follows the identical Russell 1000 Growth Index for a fraction of it. Same index, different sticker.
  • A growth screen keeps only part of the Russell 1000, so the ride depends on whichever names the index currently counts as fast growers.
  • SCHG Growth-only by design. Value and dividend-heavy corners of the market sit outside the mandate, so the ride differs from a total-market fund.
  • Large-cap U.S. only, roughly 200 stocks. No mid-caps, no small-caps, nothing overseas.
  • VUG charges a hair less for a similar broad-growth mandate. A tiny gap, but it is there. Distributions here arrive quarterly.

Full IWF profile⁠

Full SCHG profile⁠

IWF vs SCHG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IWF vs SCHG Cost

Overpaying IWF vs SCHG

$2,900

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IWF 0.18%

    $3,749

  • SCHG 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IWF 0.18%
  • SCHG 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K$4K051015202530IWF $3,749SCHG $849

Year by year

YearIWFSCHGOverpaying
10$328$73$255
20$1,281$288$993
30$3,749$849$2,900

Expense ratio

  • 0.18%IWF
  • 0.04%SCHG, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Growth Index funds
  • Median 0.18%

SCHG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds

IWF 17th cheapest of 35 funds

IWF vs SCHG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
IWF 0.37%
SCHG 0.40%, better
Payout (12M)
IWF $0.43
SCHG $0.14
Last payment
IWF $0.11
SCHG $0.04
Ex-dividend
IWF Sep 15, 2026
SCHG Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
IWF Sep 18, 2026
SCHG Sep 28, 2026
Frequency
IWF Quarterly
SCHG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IWFQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll IWF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.08; Jul 6, 2017 $0.11; Sep 26, 2017 $0.09; Dec 21, 2017 $0.09; Mar 22, 2018 $0.10; Jul 3, 2018 $0.11; Sep 26, 2018 $0.11; Dec 17, 2018 $0.09; Dec 28, 2018 $0.0062; Mar 20, 2019 $0.11; Jun 17, 2019 $0.11; Sep 24, 2019 $0.11; Dec 16, 2019 $0.11; Mar 25, 2020 $0.11; Jun 15, 2020 $0.09; Sep 23, 2020 $0.11; Dec 14, 2020 $0.09; Mar 25, 2021 $0.09; Jun 10, 2021 $0.08; Sep 24, 2021 $0.11; Dec 13, 2021 $0.10; Mar 24, 2022 $0.10; Jun 9, 2022 $0.10; Sep 26, 2022 $0.15; Dec 13, 2022 $0.14; Mar 23, 2023 $0.13; Jun 7, 2023 $0.10; Sep 26, 2023 $0.13; Mar 21, 2024 $0.11; Jun 11, 2024 $0.10; Sep 25, 2024 $0.14; Dec 17, 2024 $0.11; Mar 18, 2025 $0.10; Jun 16, 2025 $0.10; Sep 16, 2025 $0.11; Dec 16, 2025 $0.12; Mar 17, 2026 $0.10; Jun 15, 2026 $0.11; Sep 15, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD
SCHGQuarterly · 42 paymentsAll SCHG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 42 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2017 $0.02; Jun 19, 2017 $0.02; Sep 18, 2017 $0.03; Dec 18, 2017 $0.02; Mar 16, 2018 $0.02; Jun 26, 2018 $0.02; Sep 25, 2018 $0.02; Dec 12, 2018 $0.03; Dec 28, 2018 $0.02; Mar 20, 2019 $0.02; Jun 26, 2019 $0.03; Sep 25, 2019 $0.03; Dec 12, 2019 $0.02; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Jun 24, 2020 $0.02; Sep 23, 2020 $0.02; Dec 10, 2020 $0.02; Mar 24, 2021 $0.02; Jun 23, 2021 $0.02; Sep 22, 2021 $0.02; Dec 8, 2021 $0.03; Dec 30, 2021 $0.0051; Mar 23, 2022 $0.02; Jun 22, 2022 $0.02; Sep 21, 2022 $0.02; Dec 7, 2022 $0.02; Mar 22, 2023 $0.02; Jun 21, 2023 $0.02; Sep 20, 2023 $0.02; Dec 6, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.0063; Mar 20, 2024 $0.02; Jun 26, 2024 $0.03; Sep 25, 2024 $0.03; Dec 11, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.03; Jun 25, 2025 $0.03; Sep 24, 2025 $0.03; Dec 10, 2025 $0.03; Mar 25, 2026 $0.04; Jun 24, 2026 $0.03; Sep 23, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD

IWF vs SCHG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • IWF
  • SCHG
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: SCHG −34.6% · Jan 2023. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IWF 16.8%SCHG 16.5%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IWF 1.01SCHG 1.16, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IWF −32.7%, betterSCHG −34.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IWF 1.17SCHG 1.20

IWF and SCHG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • IWFBvsSPYGA

    iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHGAvsSPYGA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IWFBvsILCGA

    iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHGAvsILCGA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IWFBvsIMCGA

    iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHGAvsIMCGA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.