RYLD ranks 1st and IWMI 5th of 9 funds in the Russell 2000 Option Income Category.
IWMI vs RYLD
RYLD −0.08pt a year
0.68%0.60%
RYLD 1.2×the volume
428K504K
IWMI vs RYLD Performance
+15.2%+12.1%
- IWMI 0.68%
- RYLD 0.60%, better
- IWMI $1.32B
- RYLD $1.3B
- IWMI +15.2%, better
- RYLD +12.1%
- IWMI 14.81%, better
- RYLD 12.18%
- IWMI 2
- RYLD 6
- IWMI 428K sh
- RYLD 504K sh, better
- IWMI $48.86
- RYLD $15.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWMI | RYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B62 | A72Higher |
| Mission | A97 | |
| Risk | C49 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | A94Higher | A83 |
| Holdings | C50Higher | C45 |
| Durability | B68 | A86Higher |
Rank among Russell 2000 Option Income funds
Same Category. IWMI and RYLD are both graded against the same 9 Russell 2000 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWMIB
RYLDA
In short
IWMI Small-cap income with tax plumbing: Russell 2000 exposure plus an actively managed index-option overlay, paying monthly since its 2024 launch. The fee is 0.68% net of a waiver through May 1, 2027.
RYLD The veteran of small-cap options income. Launched in 2019 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it owns the Russell 2000 and sells calls against it, swapping some upside for a monthly check.
Stated mandate
IWMI The Fund seeks high monthly income with tax efficiency and potential equity appreciation by investing in Russell 2000-related equity exposures and using a call-option strategy.
RYLD The Fund is designed to track the price and yield performance of the Cboe Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWMI vs RYLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWMI vs RYLD Cost
Overpaying IWMI vs RYLD
$1,435
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWMI 0.68%
$13,252
RYLD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWMI | RYLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,215 | $1,076 | $139 |
| 20 | $4,633 | $4,116 | $517 |
| 30 | $13,252 | $11,817 | $1,435 |
- 0.68%IWMI
- 0.60%RYLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Option Income funds
- Median 0.69%
RYLD 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
IWMI 4th cheapest of 9 funds
IWMI vs RYLD Dividends
- IWMI 14.81%, better
- RYLD 12.18%
- IWMI $7.24
- RYLD $1.87
- IWMI $0.57
- RYLD $0.15
- IWMI Oct 21, 2026
- RYLD Oct 19, 2026
- IWMI Oct 23, 2026
- RYLD Oct 22, 2026
- IWMI Monthly
- RYLD Monthly
Distribution history
IWMI vs RYLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWMI 13.6%RYLD 8.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- IWMI 0.76RYLD 0.73
- Worst fall
- IWMI −23.9%RYLD −21.4%
- Market sensitivity
- IWMI 0.95RYLD 0.54
Popular comparisons
- 0.68% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.