RYLG ranks 2nd and IWMI 5th of 9 funds in the Russell 2000 Option Income Category.
IWMI vs RYLG
RYLG −0.33pt a year
0.68%0.35%
IWMI 234.6×the volume
428K1.82K
IWMI vs RYLG Performance
+15.2%+12.7%
- IWMI 0.68%
- RYLG 0.35%, better
- IWMI $1.32B
- RYLG $7M
- IWMI +15.2%, better
- RYLG +12.7%
- IWMI 14.81%, better
- RYLG 10.40%
- IWMI 2
- RYLG 2
- IWMI 428K sh, better
- RYLG 1.82K sh
- IWMI $48.86
- RYLG $23.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWMI | RYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B62 | A93Higher |
| Mission | A99 | |
| Risk | C49Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | C50Higher | C45 |
| Durability | B68Higher | C45 |
Rank among Russell 2000 Option Income funds
Same Category. IWMI and RYLG are both graded against the same 9 Russell 2000 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWMIB
RYLGA
In short
IWMI Small-cap income with tax plumbing: Russell 2000 exposure plus an actively managed index-option overlay, paying monthly since its 2024 launch. The fee is 0.68% net of a waiver through May 1, 2027.
RYLG Most small-cap income funds sell calls on the whole book. RYLG writes one-month at-the-money calls on about half of it, leaving the rest uncapped, and it charges the lowest fee in its Russell 2000 options-income group.
Stated mandate
IWMI The Fund seeks high monthly income with tax efficiency and potential equity appreciation by investing in Russell 2000-related equity exposures and using a call-option strategy.
RYLG The Fund seeks results generally corresponding to the Cboe Russell 2000 Half BuyWrite Index. It obtains Russell 2000 equity exposure and sells one-month at-the-money calls covering approximately half of the portfolio value.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWMI vs RYLG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWMI vs RYLG Cost
Overpaying IWMI vs RYLG
$6,126
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWMI 0.68%
$13,252
RYLG 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWMI | RYLG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,215 | $634 | $581 |
| 20 | $4,633 | $2,454 | $2,179 |
| 30 | $13,252 | $7,126 | $6,126 |
- 0.68%IWMI
- 0.35%RYLG, cheaper
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Option Income funds
- Median 0.69%
RYLG cheapest of 9 funds
IWMI 4th cheapest of 9 funds
IWMI vs RYLG Dividends
- IWMI 14.81%, better
- RYLG 10.40%
- IWMI $7.24
- RYLG $2.42
- IWMI $0.57
- RYLG $0.11
- IWMI Oct 21, 2026
- RYLG Oct 19, 2026
- IWMI Oct 23, 2026
- RYLG Oct 22, 2026
- IWMI Monthly
- RYLG Monthly
Distribution history
IWMI vs RYLG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWMI 13.6%RYLG 13.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- IWMI 0.76RYLG 0.83
- Worst fall
- IWMI −23.9%RYLG −22.4%
- Market sensitivity
- IWMI 0.95RYLG 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.68% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.