SCHM ranks 2nd and IWR 4th of 13 funds in the US Mid-Cap Category.
IWR vs SCHM
SCHM −0.15pt a year
0.18%0.03%
IWR 1.00×the volume
1.79M1.78M
IWR +0.4pt
+11.6%+11.2%
IWR vs SCHM Performance
+42.1%+39.8%
- IWR 0.18%
- SCHM 0.03%, better
- IWR $58.1B
- SCHM $14.8B
- IWR +16.3%
- SCHM +19.7%, better
- IWR 1.16%
- SCHM 1.27%, better
- IWR 827
- SCHM 502
- IWR 1.79M sh, better
- SCHM 1.78M sh
- IWR $110.06
- SCHM $34.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWR | SCHM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C43 | A86Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B68Higher | D36 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | A82 |
| Holdings | A83 | A87Higher |
| Durability | A86Higher | A73 |
Rank among US Mid-Cap funds
Same Category. IWR and SCHM are both graded against the same 13 US Mid-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWRA
SCHMA
In short
IWR The Russell mid-cap standard: roughly 800 mid-sized US companies in one ticker, tracked since 2001. Big, heavily traded, and priced a notch above the index-fund floor.
SCHM The forgotten middle of the US market, for three basis points. SCHM has tracked the Dow Jones U.S. Mid-Cap Total Stock Market Index since 2011, holding roughly 500 companies at a fee nobody in the category undercuts.
Stated mandate
IWR The fund seeks to track an index composed of mid-sized U.S. companies.
SCHM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Mid-Cap Total Stock Market Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWR vs SCHM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWR vs SCHM Cost
Overpaying IWR vs SCHM
$3,111
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWR 0.18%
$3,749
SCHM 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWR | SCHM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $55 | $273 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $216 | $1,065 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $638 | $3,111 |
- 0.18%IWR
- 0.03%SCHM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Mid-Cap funds
- Median 0.15%
SCHM cheapest of 13 funds
IWR 8th cheapest of 13 funds
IWR vs SCHM Dividends
- IWR 1.16%
- SCHM 1.27%, better
- IWR $1.27
- SCHM $0.44
- IWR $0.33
- SCHM $0.13
- IWR Sep 15, 2026
- SCHM Sep 23, 2026
- IWR Sep 18, 2026
- SCHM Sep 28, 2026
- IWR Quarterly
- SCHM Quarterly
Distribution history
IWR vs SCHM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IWR
- SCHM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWR 14.1%, betterSCHM 15.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- IWR 1.08, betterSCHM 0.93
- Worst fall
- IWR −26.2%, betterSCHM −26.5%
- Market sensitivity
- IWR 1.01SCHM 1.06
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.