XLC ranks 1st and IYZ 5th of 9 funds in the Communication Services (Broad) Category.
IYZ vs XLC
XLC −0.29pt a year
0.37%0.08%
XLC 5.9×the volume
1.01M5.97M
IYZ +0.5pt
+6.1%+5.6%
IYZ vs XLC Performance
+34.2%+31.1%
- IYZ 0.37%
- XLC 0.08%, better
- IYZ $762M
- XLC $21.8B
- IYZ +18.4%, better
- XLC −11.9%
- IYZ 1.75%, better
- XLC 1.38%
- IYZ 24
- XLC 24
- IYZ 1.01M sh
- XLC 5.97M sh, better
- IYZ $38.39
- XLC $101.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IYZ | XLC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D32 | A90Higher |
| Mission | A88 | |
| Risk | B61Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | A78 | A95Higher |
| Holdings | C49Higher | C44 |
| Durability | A77 | A77 |
Rank among Communication Services (Broad) funds
Same Category. IYZ and XLC are both graded against the same 9 Communication Services (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IYZC
XLCA
In short
IYZ One of the original sector ETFs, trading since 2000 and still literal about telecom: U.S. phone, internet and communication companies, with index caps that stop any one carrier from swallowing the portfolio.
XLC Launched in 2018, XLC bottles the communication services corner of the S&P 500: search, social, streaming and the phone companies, in one 0.08% wrapper that trades heavily all day.
Stated mandate
IYZ The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. equities in the telecommunications sector and provides diversified access to U.S. companies offering phone, internet, and communication services.
XLC The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Communication Services Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IYZ vs XLC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IYZ vs XLC Cost
Overpaying IYZ vs XLC
$5,824
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IYZ 0.37%
$7,513
XLC 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IYZ | XLC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $147 | $523 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $575 | $2,015 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $1,689 | $5,824 |
- 0.37%IYZ
- 0.08%XLC, cheaper
- Middle half of Communication Services (Broad) funds
- Median 0.35%
XLC cheapest of 9 funds
IYZ 6th cheapest of 9 funds
IYZ vs XLC Dividends
- IYZ 1.75%, better
- XLC 1.38%
- IYZ $0.67
- XLC $1.38
- IYZ $0.18
- XLC $0.36
- IYZ Sep 15, 2026
- XLC Sep 21, 2026
- IYZ Sep 18, 2026
- XLC Sep 23, 2026
- IYZ Quarterly
- XLC Quarterly
Distribution history
IYZ vs XLC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IYZ
- XLC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IYZ 15.7%XLC 15.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IYZ 1.24, betterXLC 0.82
- Worst fall
- IYZ −37.5%, betterXLC −43.9%
- Market sensitivity
- IYZ 0.69XLC 0.85
IYZ and XLC in the news





Closing Bell
Dow drops 1.2% as Brent hits six-month high

Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.