NSCI ranks 1st of 11 funds in the Multi-Sector Securitized Bond Category.
JABS vs NSCI
JABS −0.05pt a year
0.33%0.38%
NSCI 3.4×the volume
19.5K67.2K
JABS vs NSCI Performance
+3.4%+4.0%
- JABS 0.33%, better
- NSCI 0.38%
- JABS $197M
- NSCI $310M
- JABS +3.4%
- NSCI +4.0%, better
- JABS 5.26%
- NSCI
- JABS 196
- NSCI 269
- JABS 19.5K sh
- NSCI 67.2K sh, better
- JABS $49.35
- NSCI $24.98
ETF.net Grade
- —JABSUnder classification review
| Pillar | JABS | NSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | |
| Mission | F4 | |
| Risk | B67 | |
| Tradability | A76 | |
| Holdings | A88 | |
| Durability | B65 |
Rank among Multi-Sector Securitized Bond funds
Our read on each fund
JABS—
NSCIA
In short
NSCI Securitized credit is the bond market's plumbing: mortgage, consumer-loan and CLO paper that broad index funds only skim. NSCI is Nuveen's active run at it, holding at least 80% in structured bonds with room to reach below investment grade.
Stated mandate
NSCI The Fund seeks a high level of current income and total return. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets plus investment borrowings in securitized credit investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JABS vs NSCI Holdings
How JABS and NSCI differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country87.6%
Sector
No Sector split for JABS and NSCI.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in JABSMore in NSCI | JABS | NSCI |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | JABS +11.9 points | 96.5% | 84.6% |
| Cayman Islands | NSCI +11.4 points | 2.9% | 14.3% |
| United Kingdom | NSCI +0.7 points | 0.0% | 0.7% |
| Other countries (2) | JABS +0.1 points | 0.6% | 0.5% |
Concentration
- JABS21.4%
- NSCI10.5%
- JABS193
- NSCI260
Asset class
- JABS
- Fixed Income
- NSCI
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. JABS holds 193 securities, NSCI 260.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JABS vs NSCI Cost
Overpaying NSCI vs JABS
$969
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JABS 0.33%
$6,737
NSCI 0.38%
$7,706
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JABS | NSCI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $598 | $688 | $90 |
| 20 | $2,318 | $2,658 | $340 |
| 30 | $6,737 | $7,706 | $969 |
- 0.33%JABS, cheaper
- 0.38%NSCI
- Middle half of Multi-Sector Securitized Bond funds
- Median 0.39%
JABS 3rd cheapest of 11 funds
NSCI 4th cheapest of 11 funds
JABS vs NSCI Dividends
- JABS 5.26%
- NSCI
- JABS $2.60
- NSCI
- JABS $0.19
- NSCI $0.11
- JABS Oct 30, 2026
- NSCI Nov 2, 2026
- JABS Pays Nov 5, 2026
- NSCI Pays Nov 3, 2026
- JABS Monthly
- NSCI Monthly
Distribution history
JABS vs NSCI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JABS 1.4%NSCI 1.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- JABS −0.04NSCI 0.06
- Worst fall
- JABS −1.0%NSCI −1.1%
- Market sensitivity
- JABS 0.03NSCI 0.05
JABS and NSCI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.33% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

