SPAB ranks 2nd and JCPB 45th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
JCPB vs SPAB
SPAB −0.37pt a year
0.40%0.03%
SPAB 1.1×the volume
2.71M3.11M
JCPB +1.0pt
+0.8%−0.2%
JCPB vs SPAB Performance
+3.9%−0.9%
- JCPB 0.40%
- SPAB 0.03%, better
- JCPB $17.5B
- SPAB $10.4B
- JCPB +0.4%, better
- SPAB −0.2%
- JCPB 4.97%, better
- SPAB 4.20%
- JCPB 2808
- SPAB 8697
- JCPB 2.71M sh
- SPAB 3.11M sh, better
- JCPB $45.49
- SPAB $24.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JCPB | SPAB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D36 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B62Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | B61 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | A71 | A76Higher |
| Durability | A81 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. JCPB and SPAB are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JCPBB
SPABA
In short
JCPB The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate is JCPB's yardstick, not its cage. J.P. Morgan's bond desk builds a mostly investment-grade core, then reaches into high yield and foreign debt for extra income. Cost: 0.40% a year.
SPAB A 2007-vintage core bond fund priced at 0.03%: roughly 8,500 US investment-grade bonds in one ticket, at the same rock-bottom fee the household names charge for the same index.
Stated mandate
JCPB The ETF seeks a high level of current income from investment-grade and non-investment-grade securities. It mainly uses investment-grade bonds, while combining bottom-up selection, dynamic sector allocation, and macro analysis of the yield curve, duration, and portfolio risk.
SPAB The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index before fees and expenses, providing broad exposure to U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JCPB vs SPAB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JCPB vs SPAB Cost
Overpaying JCPB vs SPAB
$7,452
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JCPB 0.40%
$8,090
SPAB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JCPB | SPAB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $55 | $668 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $216 | $2,577 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $638 | $7,452 |
- 0.40%JCPB
- 0.03%SPAB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SPAB 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
JCPB 74th cheapest of 114 funds
JCPB vs SPAB Dividends
- JCPB 4.97%, better
- SPAB 4.20%
- JCPB $2.27
- SPAB $1.04
- JCPB $0.18
- SPAB $0.09
- JCPB Oct 1, 2026
- SPAB Oct 1, 2026
- JCPB Oct 5, 2026
- SPAB Oct 6, 2026
- JCPB Monthly
- SPAB Monthly
Distribution history
JCPB vs SPAB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JCPB
- SPAB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JCPB 5.6%SPAB 5.6%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- JCPB 0.36, betterSPAB 0.17
- Worst fall
- JCPB −16.4%, betterSPAB −17.4%
- Market sensitivity
- JCPB 1.00SPAB 1.00Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
JCPB and SPAB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

