Skip to content

JDST vs RWM

Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X ETF

JDSTCNYSE Arca

ProShares Short Russell2000

RWMBNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

JDST −0.03pt a year

JDST0.92%RWM0.95%

Avg volume · 30D

RWM 46.7×the volume

JDST642KRWM30M

10Y return · a year

RWM +50.3pt

JDST−61.6%RWM−11.3%

JDST vs RWM Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

−98.4%JDST−15.9%RWM

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. JDST −98.4%. RWM −15.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−75%−50%0%25%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
JDST 0.92%, better
RWM 0.95%
Fund size
JDST $47M
RWM $163M
1Y total return
JDST −61.1%
RWM −10.1%, better
Yield (12M)
JDST 4.60%, better
RWM 3.31%
Holdings
JDST 4
RWM 3
Avg volume (30D)
JDST 642K sh
RWM 30M sh, better
NAV per share
JDST $34.61
RWM $14.37
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JDST: Cost 50, Risk 17, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings not scored, Durability 53. RWM: Cost 50, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 90, Holdings 63, Durability 69.
Pillar letters and Scores for JDST, RWM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJDSTRWM
Cost30% weightC50C50
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF17B60Higher
Tradability15% weightC46A90Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB63
Durability5% weightC53B69Higher

Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JDST and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 53 ›

RWM ranks 4th and JDST 31st of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1BDOGProShares Short Dow30Score 65
  2. Rank 1BPSQProShares Short QQQScore 65
  3. Rank 1BSVXYProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETFScore 65
  4. Rank 4BRWMProShares Short Russell2000Score 63
  5. Rank 5BSJBProShares Short High YieldScore 62
  6. Rank 29CFXPProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50Score 43
  7. Rank 31CJDSTDirexion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X ETFScore 41
  8. Rank 32CBZQProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil CappedScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JDSTCDirexion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X ETF

RWMBProShares Short Russell2000

In short

JDST The gold trade's wildest corner, played from the short side. JDST targets 200% of the inverse of the junior gold miners index each day, then resets at the bell. A tactical instrument, priced below the leveraged-bear norm.

RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.

Stated mandate

JDST JDST seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the inverse performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index.

RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.

Why people hold it

  • JDST Charges 0.92% a year, below the going rate in the leveraged bear aisle, where fees usually sting.
  • One job, stated plainly: 200% of the inverse of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, daily, before fees. No manager discretion, no drift into other bets.direxion.com
  • Actively traded, which is what counts for a vehicle built to be held in short stretches and watched every day.
  • Running since 2013, through full boom and bust cycles in gold, and one of the stronger builds in its leveraged bear peer group.
  • RWM Straight -1x, not a multiplier: it tracks the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, where stablemate TWM targets -2x on the same index.proshares.com
  • ProShares calls it the only -1x ETF tied to the Russell 2000, the index of the 2,000 smallest US names in the Russell 3000.proshares.comproshares.com 2
  • Trading since January 2007 and one of the busier funds in the inverse-equity aisle, so entering and exiting is rarely the hard part.
  • Fee is 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (1.05% gross), near what this category charges, and it rates among the strongest builds in its peer group.

Worth knowing

  • JDST The -2x target applies to a single day. Hold longer and compounding takes the wheel: results can diverge sharply from twice the index's inverse move, especially in choppy markets.direxion.com
  • Junior miners are the twitchiest slice of gold equities. Double the exposure and flip the sign, and daily moves get large in both directions.
  • The asset base is small, something to weigh when sizing a position. Distributions, when paid, come on a quarterly schedule.
  • RWM The -1x target resets daily. Hold longer and compounding rules: ProShares says multi-day returns can differ significantly from the target, in amount and even direction.proshares.comproshares.com 2
  • Symmetric by design: on days the Russell 2000 climbs, the fund is built to lose roughly as much as the index gains.proshares.com
  • Fund documents tell investors to monitor holdings as frequently as daily, which puts this at the hands-on end of the shelf.proshares.com

Full JDST profile⁠

Full RWM profile⁠

JDST vs RWM Holdings

How JDST and RWM differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of JDST and 0.0% of RWM.

Level by level

  • Asset classLeveraged/Inverse, Equity0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%

Sector

No Sector split for JDST.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for JDST.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • JDST180.4%
  • RWM100.0%

Securities held

  • JDST0
  • RWM2

Asset class

JDST
Leveraged/Inverse
RWM
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in JDST0
  • In both0
  • Only in RWM2

Only in JDST

0 securities, 0.0% of JDST by weight

Only in RWM

2 securities, 86.4% of RWM by weight

  • Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf81.69%
  • TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-174.71%

Weight gaps

JDST and RWM share no securities.

All 7 JDST holdings⁠All 12 RWM holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JDST vs RWM Cost

Overpaying RWM vs JDST

$496

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JDST 0.92%

    $17,373

  • RWM 0.95%

    $17,869

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JDST 0.92%
  • RWM 0.95%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530RWM $17,869JDST $17,373

Year by year

YearJDSTRWMOverpaying
10$1,627$1,678$51
20$6,138$6,322$184
30$17,373$17,869$496

Expense ratio

  • 0.92%JDST, cheaper
  • 0.95%RWM
  • Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

JDST 4th cheapest of 53 funds

RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds

JDST vs RWM Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
JDST 4.60%, better
RWM 3.31%
Payout (12M)
JDST $1.52
RWM $0.48
Last payment
JDST $0.21
RWM $0.09
Ex-dividend
JDST Sep 22, 2026
RWM Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
JDST Sep 29, 2026
RWM Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
JDST Quarterly
RWM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

JDSTQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll JDST payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 24, 2025 $1.92; Sep 23, 2025 $1.18; Dec 23, 2025 $0.44; Mar 24, 2026 $0.62; Jun 23, 2026 $0.25; Sep 22, 2026 $0.21. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD
RWMQuarterly · 26 paymentsAll RWM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 26 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2017 $0.03; Mar 21, 2018 $0.04; Jun 20, 2018 $0.10; Sep 26, 2018 $0.14; Dec 26, 2018 $0.13; Mar 20, 2019 $0.11; Jun 25, 2019 $0.18; Sep 25, 2019 $0.15; Dec 24, 2019 $0.14; Mar 25, 2020 $0.05; Dec 22, 2022 $0.10; Mar 22, 2023 $0.15; Jun 21, 2023 $0.24; Sep 20, 2023 $0.27; Dec 20, 2023 $0.35; Mar 20, 2024 $0.26; Jun 26, 2024 $0.29; Sep 25, 2024 $0.28; Dec 23, 2024 $0.30; Mar 26, 2025 $0.14; Jun 25, 2025 $0.20; Sep 24, 2025 $0.13; Dec 24, 2025 $0.18; Mar 25, 2026 $0.06; Jun 24, 2026 $0.14; Sep 23, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD

JDST vs RWM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • JDST
  • RWM
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: JDST −99.5% · Aug 2026. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−100%−75%−50%−25%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JDST 80.8%RWM 18.4%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JDST −1.10RWM −0.99, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JDST −99.5%RWM −43.7%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JDST −1.13RWM −1.23

Popular comparisons

  • JDSTCvsDOGB

    Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X ETF · ProShares Short Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.92% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RWMBvsDOGB

    ProShares Short Russell2000 · ProShares Short Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JDSTCvsPSQB

    Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X ETF · ProShares Short QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.92% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RWMBvsPSQB

    ProShares Short Russell2000 · ProShares Short QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JDSTCvsSVXYB

    Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X ETF · ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.92% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RWMBvsSVXYB

    ProShares Short Russell2000 · ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.