RWM ranks 4th and JDST 31st of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
JDST vs RWM
0.0%by weight
JDST −0.03pt a year
0.92%0.95%
RWM 46.7×the volume
642K30M
RWM +50.3pt
−61.6%−11.3%
JDST vs RWM Performance
−98.4%−15.9%
- JDST 0.92%, better
- RWM 0.95%
- JDST $47M
- RWM $163M
- JDST −61.1%
- RWM −10.1%, better
- JDST 4.60%, better
- RWM 3.31%
- JDST 4
- RWM 3
- JDST 642K sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- JDST $34.61
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JDST | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F17 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | C53 | B69Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. JDST and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JDSTC
RWMB
In short
JDST The gold trade's wildest corner, played from the short side. JDST targets 200% of the inverse of the junior gold miners index each day, then resets at the bell. A tactical instrument, priced below the leveraged-bear norm.
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
JDST JDST seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the inverse performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index.
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JDST vs RWM Holdings
How JDST and RWM differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of JDST and 0.0% of RWM.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for JDST.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for JDST.
Concentration
- JDST180.4%
- RWM100.0%
- JDST0
- RWM2
Asset class
- JDST
- Leveraged/Inverse
- RWM
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in JDST0
- In both0
- Only in RWM2
Only in JDST
0 securities, 0.0% of JDST by weight
Only in RWM
2 securities, 86.4% of RWM by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf81.69%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-174.71%
Weight gaps
JDST and RWM share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JDST vs RWM Cost
Overpaying RWM vs JDST
$496
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JDST 0.92%
$17,373
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JDST | RWM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,627 | $1,678 | $51 |
| 20 | $6,138 | $6,322 | $184 |
| 30 | $17,373 | $17,869 | $496 |
- 0.92%JDST, cheaper
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
JDST 4th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
JDST vs RWM Dividends
- JDST 4.60%, better
- RWM 3.31%
- JDST $1.52
- RWM $0.48
- JDST $0.21
- RWM $0.09
- JDST Sep 22, 2026
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- JDST Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- JDST Quarterly
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
JDST vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JDST
- RWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JDST 80.8%RWM 18.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- JDST −1.10RWM −0.99, better
- Worst fall
- JDST −99.5%RWM −43.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- JDST −1.13RWM −1.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.92% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.92% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.92% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.