SPBO ranks 2nd and JLQD 33rd of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
JLQD vs SPBO
SPBO −0.32pt a year
0.35%0.03%
SPBO 782.3×the volume
755591K
SPBO +0.2pt
−0.1%+0.1%
JLQD vs SPBO Performance
−0.4%+0.3%
- JLQD 0.35%
- SPBO 0.03%, better
- JLQD $16M
- SPBO $2.14B
- JLQD −1.3%
- SPBO −0.4%, better
- JLQD 6.18%, better
- SPBO 5.28%
- JLQD 146
- SPBO 4468
- JLQD 755 sh
- SPBO 591K sh, better
- JLQD $39.58
- SPBO $27.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JLQD | SPBO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D29 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C52 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | F19 | A96Higher |
| Holdings | B55 | A82Higher |
| Durability | D36 | A90Higher |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. JLQD and SPBO are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JLQDC
SPBOA
In short
JLQD A boutique take on investment-grade credit: roughly 180 corporate bonds measured against the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index, with cash paid out monthly. Small, lightly traded, and priced above the plain index trackers on the same benchmark.
SPBO The whole investment-grade corporate bond market in one ticker for three basis points. Most rivals sell you a maturity slice; SPBO owns the lot, and it undercuts other funds tracking the very same Bloomberg index.
Stated mandate
JLQD The fund seeks total return through both income and capital appreciation.
SPBO The fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JLQD vs SPBO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JLQD vs SPBO Cost
Overpaying JLQD vs SPBO
$6,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JLQD 0.35%
$7,126
SPBO 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JLQD | SPBO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $55 | $579 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $216 | $2,238 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $638 | $6,488 |
- 0.35%JLQD
- 0.03%SPBO, cheaper
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
SPBO cheapest of 49 funds
JLQD 33rd cheapest of 49 funds
JLQD vs SPBO Dividends
- JLQD 6.18%, better
- SPBO 5.28%
- JLQD $2.43
- SPBO $1.48
- JLQD $0.19
- SPBO $0.12
- JLQD Oct 30, 2026
- SPBO Oct 1, 2026
- JLQD Pays Nov 5, 2026
- SPBO Oct 6, 2026
- JLQD Monthly
- SPBO Monthly
Distribution history
JLQD vs SPBO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JLQD
- SPBO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JLQD 6.5%SPBO 6.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- JLQD 0.34SPBO 0.34Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- JLQD −20.9%, betterSPBO −21.7%
- Market sensitivity
- JLQD 1.15SPBO 1.11
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.