Skip to content

JLQD vs USIG

Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF

JLQDCNYSE Arca

iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

USIGANasdaq

Overlap

No data

Expense ratio

USIG −0.31pt a year

JLQD0.35%USIG0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

USIG 2861.2×the volume

JLQD755USIG2.16M

5Y return · a year

USIG +0.3pt

JLQD−0.1%USIG+0.2%

JLQD vs USIG Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.4%JLQD+0.8%USIG

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. JLQD −0.4%. USIG +0.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
JLQD 0.35%
USIG 0.04%, better
Fund size
JLQD $16M
USIG $18B
1Y total return
JLQD −1.3%
USIG −0.4%, better
Yield (12M)
JLQD 6.18%, better
USIG 4.92%
Holdings
JLQD 146
USIG 11595
Avg volume (30D)
JLQD 755 sh
USIG 2.16M sh, better
NAV per share
JLQD $39.58
USIG $49.53
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JLQD: Cost 29, Risk 52, Mission 100, Tradability 19, Holdings 55, Durability 36. USIG: Cost 98, Risk 48, Mission 100, Tradability 95, Holdings 97, Durability 92.
Pillar letters and Scores for JLQD, USIG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJLQDUSIG
Cost30% weightD29A98Higher
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightC52HigherC48
Tradability15% weightF19A95Higher
Holdings10% weightB55A97Higher
Durability5% weightD36A92Higher

Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JLQD and USIG are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Investment Grade Corporate⁠

Category · 49 funds
See all 49 ›

USIG ranks 1st and JLQD 33rd of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.

  1. Rank 1AUSIGiShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETFScore 90
  2. Rank 2ASPBOState Street SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETFScore 89
  3. Rank 33CFIGBFidelity Investment Grade Bond ETFScore 51
  4. Rank 33CJLQDJanus Henderson Corporate Bond ETFScore 51
  5. Rank 35CFTRBFederated Hermes Total Return Bond ETFScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JLQDCJanus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF

USIGAiShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

In short

JLQD A boutique take on investment-grade credit: roughly 180 corporate bonds measured against the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index, with cash paid out monthly. Small, lightly traded, and priced above the plain index trackers on the same benchmark.

USIG Most investment-grade corporate bond funds hand you one slice of the maturity curve. USIG takes the whole thing, thousands of US dollar corporate bonds from short-dated to long, for four basis points a year.

Stated mandate

JLQD The fund seeks total return through both income and capital appreciation.

USIG The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds.

Why people hold it

  • JLQD Stays on-label. The portfolio has hewed closely to its stated corporate-bond mandate rather than drifting into other corners of credit.
  • Pays monthly, with a stated goal of total return from both income and capital appreciation.janushenderson.com
  • Spread across roughly 180 corporate bonds benchmarked to the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index, so no single issuer carries the fund.
  • USIG Costs 0.04% a year, against a category median near 0.19%. CORP, which tracks the same ICE BofA US Corporate Index, charges 0.41%.
  • One ticker, the full USD investment-grade corporate curve: thousands of bonds, short to long. Slice funds like IGSB (1-5 year) and IGIB (5-10 year) each cover one segment.ishares.com
  • Running since 2007, it has tracked its index with very little drift and is one of the more actively traded funds in its category.
  • Interest lands monthly, and this is a multi-billion-dollar fund that ranks among the strongest implementations in its peer group.

Worth knowing

  • JLQD The 0.35% fee runs above the typical investment-grade corporate fund and far above same-benchmark trackers like SPBO and VTC at 0.03%.
  • Small fund, light trading. That usually means wider bid-ask spreads than the category giants, and bigger orders can nudge the price.
  • Investment-grade corporate bonds still move with interest rates and credit spreads. This is a bond fund, not a cash substitute.
  • USIG Owning the whole curve means long-dated bonds ride along, so the price swings more when rates move than a short-maturity slice such as IGSB.
  • This is corporate credit, not Treasuries. Investment grade at purchase, but prices can fall when spreads widen or an issuer is downgraded.ishares.com
  • VCIT edges it on fee at 0.03%, though that fund stays in intermediate maturities rather than the full curve.

Full JLQD profile⁠

Full USIG profile⁠

JLQD vs USIG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JLQD vs USIG Cost

Overpaying JLQD vs USIG

$6,277

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JLQD 0.35%

    $7,126

  • USIG 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JLQD 0.35%
  • USIG 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530JLQD $7,126USIG $849

Year by year

YearJLQDUSIGOverpaying
10$634$73$561
20$2,454$288$2,166
30$7,126$849$6,277

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%JLQD
  • 0.04%USIG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
  • Median 0.25%

USIG 3rd cheapest of 49 funds

JLQD 33rd cheapest of 49 funds

JLQD vs USIG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
JLQD 6.18%, better
USIG 4.92%
Payout (12M)
JLQD $2.43
USIG $2.44
Last payment
JLQD $0.19
USIG $0.21
Ex-dividend
JLQD Oct 30, 2026
USIG Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
JLQD Pays Nov 5, 2026
USIG Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
JLQD Monthly
USIG Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

JLQDMonthly · 46 paymentsAll JLQD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Feb 1, 2023 $0.12; Mar 1, 2023 $0.13; Apr 3, 2023 $0.13; May 1, 2023 $0.13; Jun 1, 2023 $0.14; Jul 3, 2023 $0.14; Aug 1, 2023 $0.14; Sep 1, 2023 $0.14; Oct 2, 2023 $0.15; Nov 1, 2023 $0.15; Dec 1, 2023 $0.16; Dec 22, 2023 $0.15; Feb 1, 2024 $0.16; Mar 1, 2024 $0.17; Apr 1, 2024 $0.17; May 1, 2024 $0.17; Jun 3, 2024 $0.18; Jul 1, 2024 $0.18; Aug 1, 2024 $0.18; Sep 3, 2024 $0.18; Oct 1, 2024 $0.18; Nov 1, 2024 $0.18; Dec 2, 2024 $0.28; Dec 23, 2024 $0.18; Feb 3, 2025 $0.18; Mar 3, 2025 $0.18; Apr 1, 2025 $0.18; May 1, 2025 $0.22; Jun 2, 2025 $0.18; Jul 1, 2025 $0.18; Aug 1, 2025 $0.18; Sep 2, 2025 $0.18; Oct 1, 2025 $0.18; Nov 3, 2025 $0.18; Dec 1, 2025 $0.18; Dec 22, 2025 $0.19; Jan 30, 2026 $0.18; Feb 27, 2026 $0.18; Mar 31, 2026 $0.18; Apr 30, 2026 $0.18; May 29, 2026 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.18; Jul 31, 2026 $0.18; Aug 31, 2026 $0.18; Sep 30, 2026 $0.19; Oct 30, 2026 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
USIGMonthly · 45 paymentsAll USIG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 45 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Feb 1, 2023 $0.15; Mar 1, 2023 $0.15; Apr 3, 2023 $0.16; May 1, 2023 $0.17; Jun 1, 2023 $0.17; Jul 3, 2023 $0.17; Aug 1, 2023 $0.17; Sep 1, 2023 $0.18; Oct 2, 2023 $0.17; Nov 1, 2023 $0.18; Dec 1, 2023 $0.18; Dec 14, 2023 $0.18; Feb 1, 2024 $0.18; Mar 1, 2024 $0.18; Apr 1, 2024 $0.19; May 1, 2024 $0.19; Jun 3, 2024 $0.19; Jul 1, 2024 $0.19; Aug 1, 2024 $0.19; Sep 3, 2024 $0.19; Oct 1, 2024 $0.19; Nov 1, 2024 $0.19; Dec 2, 2024 $0.19; Dec 18, 2024 $0.20; Feb 3, 2025 $0.19; Mar 3, 2025 $0.20; Apr 1, 2025 $0.19; May 1, 2025 $0.19; Jun 2, 2025 $0.20; Jul 1, 2025 $0.20; Aug 1, 2025 $0.20; Sep 2, 2025 $0.20; Oct 1, 2025 $0.20; Nov 3, 2025 $0.20; Dec 1, 2025 $0.20; Dec 19, 2025 $0.21; Feb 2, 2026 $0.19; Mar 2, 2026 $0.20; Apr 1, 2026 $0.20; May 1, 2026 $0.20; Jun 1, 2026 $0.21; Jul 1, 2026 $0.20; Aug 3, 2026 $0.21; Sep 1, 2026 $0.20; Oct 1, 2026 $0.21. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

JLQD vs USIG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • JLQD
  • USIG
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: USIG −21.1% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JLQD 6.5%USIG 6.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JLQD 0.34USIG 0.34Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JLQD −20.9%, betterUSIG −21.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JLQD 1.15USIG 1.04

JLQD and USIG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • JLQDCvsSPBOA

    Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USIGAvsSPBOA

    iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JLQDCvsVTCA

    Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF · Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USIGAvsVTCA

    iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF · Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JLQDCvsGIGBA

    Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF · Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USIGAvsGIGBA

    iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF · Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.