USIG ranks 1st and JLQD 33rd of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
JLQD vs USIG
USIG −0.31pt a year
0.35%0.04%
USIG 2861.2×the volume
7552.16M
USIG +0.3pt
−0.1%+0.2%
JLQD vs USIG Performance
−0.4%+0.8%
- JLQD 0.35%
- USIG 0.04%, better
- JLQD $16M
- USIG $18B
- JLQD −1.3%
- USIG −0.4%, better
- JLQD 6.18%, better
- USIG 4.92%
- JLQD 146
- USIG 11595
- JLQD 755 sh
- USIG 2.16M sh, better
- JLQD $39.58
- USIG $49.53
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JLQD | USIG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D29 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C52Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | F19 | A95Higher |
| Holdings | B55 | A97Higher |
| Durability | D36 | A92Higher |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. JLQD and USIG are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JLQDC
USIGA
In short
JLQD A boutique take on investment-grade credit: roughly 180 corporate bonds measured against the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index, with cash paid out monthly. Small, lightly traded, and priced above the plain index trackers on the same benchmark.
USIG Most investment-grade corporate bond funds hand you one slice of the maturity curve. USIG takes the whole thing, thousands of US dollar corporate bonds from short-dated to long, for four basis points a year.
Stated mandate
JLQD The fund seeks total return through both income and capital appreciation.
USIG The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JLQD vs USIG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JLQD vs USIG Cost
Overpaying JLQD vs USIG
$6,277
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JLQD 0.35%
$7,126
USIG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JLQD | USIG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $73 | $561 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $288 | $2,166 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $849 | $6,277 |
- 0.35%JLQD
- 0.04%USIG, cheaper
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
USIG 3rd cheapest of 49 funds
JLQD 33rd cheapest of 49 funds
JLQD vs USIG Dividends
- JLQD 6.18%, better
- USIG 4.92%
- JLQD $2.43
- USIG $2.44
- JLQD $0.19
- USIG $0.21
- JLQD Oct 30, 2026
- USIG Oct 1, 2026
- JLQD Pays Nov 5, 2026
- USIG Oct 6, 2026
- JLQD Monthly
- USIG Monthly
Distribution history
JLQD vs USIG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JLQD
- USIG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JLQD 6.5%USIG 6.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- JLQD 0.34USIG 0.34Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- JLQD −20.9%, betterUSIG −21.1%
- Market sensitivity
- JLQD 1.15USIG 1.04
JLQD and USIG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

