JMBS ranks 1st and OWNS 8th of 10 funds in the Core Securitized Bond Category.
JMBS vs OWNS
JMBS −0.47pt a year
0.21%0.68%
JMBS 60.6×the volume
841K13.9K
JMBS +0.4pt
+0.5%+0.1%
JMBS vs OWNS Performance
+2.4%+0.7%
- JMBS 0.21%, better
- OWNS 0.68%
- JMBS $6.37B
- OWNS $104M
- JMBS +0.1%
- OWNS +0.2%, better
- JMBS 5.85%, better
- OWNS 4.26%
- JMBS 415
- OWNS 267
- JMBS 841K sh, better
- OWNS 13.9K sh
- JMBS $43.40
- OWNS $16.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JMBS | OWNS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | F23 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A96 |
| Risk | D35Higher | D32 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | F16 | C45Higher |
| Durability | A82Higher | D35 |
Rank among Core Securitized Bond funds
Same Category. JMBS and OWNS are both graded against the same 10 Core Securitized Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JMBSA
OWNSC
In short
JMBS The original actively managed mortgage-backed securities ETF, launched in 2018. Rather than replicate the MBS index, the team picks through agency mortgage bonds, a corner of the market where prepayment behavior makes security selection its own craft.
OWNS Agency mortgage bonds with a filter: OWNS buys custom pools of home loans made to low- and moderate-income, minority, and persistent-poverty-area borrowers. Launched 2021 as the first ETF built around affordable homeownership. Fee: 0.68%.
Stated mandate
JMBS The fund seeks a high level of total return through both income and capital appreciation.
OWNS The Fund seeks to generate current income, primarily through mortgage-backed securities associated with affordable-housing mortgages.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JMBS vs OWNS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JMBS vs OWNS Cost
Overpaying OWNS vs JMBS
$8,895
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JMBS 0.21%
$4,357
OWNS 0.68%
$13,252
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JMBS | OWNS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $383 | $1,215 | $832 |
| 20 | $1,491 | $4,633 | $3,142 |
| 30 | $4,357 | $13,252 | $8,895 |
- 0.21%JMBS, cheaper
- 0.68%OWNS
- Middle half of Core Securitized Bond funds
- Median 0.38%
JMBS cheapest of 10 funds
OWNS 8th cheapest of 10 funds
JMBS vs OWNS Dividends
- JMBS 5.85%, better
- OWNS 4.26%
- JMBS $2.54
- OWNS $0.72
- JMBS $0.19
- OWNS $0.17
- JMBS Oct 30, 2026
- OWNS Sep 30, 2026
- JMBS Pays Nov 5, 2026
- OWNS Oct 1, 2026
- JMBS Monthly
- OWNS Quarterly
Distribution history
JMBS vs OWNS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JMBS
- OWNS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JMBS 6.9%OWNS 6.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- JMBS 0.31, betterOWNS 0.24
- Worst fall
- JMBS −16.5%, betterOWNS −16.7%
- Market sensitivity
- JMBS 1.20OWNS 1.04
Popular comparisons
- 0.21% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.