VCRM ranks 4th and JMUB 8th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
JMUB vs VCRM
VCRM −0.06pt a year
0.18%0.12%
JMUB 3.3×the volume
2.27M679K
JMUB vs VCRM Performance
+0.3%+1.1%
- JMUB 0.18%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- JMUB $9.04B
- VCRM $2.2B
- JMUB +0.3%
- VCRM +1.1%, better
- JMUB 3.49%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- JMUB 2201
- VCRM 2588
- JMUB 2.27M sh, better
- VCRM 679K sh
- JMUB $49.02
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JMUB | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B60 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | B66 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | A80 | A81Higher |
| Durability | A77Higher | A74 |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. JMUB and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JMUBA
VCRMA
In short
JMUB A national municipal bond portfolio aiming at federal tax-exempt income and capital preservation, spread across roughly 2,000 bonds, priced at 0.18% a year (well under the typical muni ETF) and paying monthly.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
JMUB The fund seeks federal tax-exempt income and capital preservation by investing in municipal securities.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JMUB vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JMUB vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying JMUB vs VCRM
$1,229
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JMUB 0.18%
$3,749
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JMUB | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $220 | $108 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $859 | $422 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,520 | $1,229 |
- 0.18%JMUB
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
JMUB 12th cheapest of 63 funds
JMUB vs VCRM Dividends
- JMUB 3.49%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- JMUB $1.71
- VCRM $2.82
- JMUB $0.16
- VCRM $0.21
- JMUB Oct 1, 2026
- VCRM Oct 1, 2026
- JMUB Oct 5, 2026
- VCRM Oct 5, 2026
- JMUB Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
JMUB vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JMUB 5.4%VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- JMUB 0.04VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- JMUB −11.7%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- JMUB 0.82VCRM 0.17
JMUB and VCRM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
