QBIF ranks 2nd and JULI 4th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.
JULI vs QBIF
QBIF −0.05pt a year
0.79%0.74%
JULI 1.7×the volume
4.89K2.9K
JULI vs QBIF Performance
−2.0%−1.2%
- JULI 0.79%
- QBIF 0.74%, better
- JULI $7M
- QBIF $9M
- JULI 3
- QBIF 3
- JULI 4.89K sh, better
- QBIF 2.9K sh
- JULI $24.77
- QBIF $26.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JULI | QBIF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A78Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B69 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | D28 | D35Higher |
| Holdings | B67Higher | B55 |
| Durability | F17 | D26Higher |
Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. JULI and QBIF are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
JULI vs QBIF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JULI vs QBIF Cost
Overpaying JULI vs QBIF
$867
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JULI 0.79%
$15,174
QBIF 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JULI | QBIF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,319 | $86 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,015 | $316 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $14,307 | $867 |
- 0.79%JULI
- 0.74%QBIF, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.85%
QBIF 6th cheapest of 26 funds
JULI 8th cheapest of 26 funds
JULI vs QBIF Dividends
- JULI None
- QBIF None
Distribution history
JULI vs QBIF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- JULI 0.00QBIF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.