PSMO ranks 1st and JULU 25th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
JULU vs PSMO
PSMO −0.25pt a year
0.74%0.49%
JULU 2.5×the volume
18.5K7.3K
JULU vs PSMO Performance
+7.7%+10.0%
- JULU 0.74%
- PSMO 0.49%, better
- JULU $80M
- PSMO $116M
- JULU +7.7%
- PSMO +10.0%, better
- JULU 2
- PSMO 3
- JULU 18.5K sh, better
- PSMO 7.3K sh
- JULU $32.53
- PSMO $33.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JULU | PSMO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | F9 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | B61 | |
| Durability | C41 | B66Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. JULU and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JULUC
PSMOB
In short
PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.
Stated mandate
PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JULU vs PSMO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JULU vs PSMO Cost
Overpaying JULU vs PSMO
$4,515
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JULU 0.74%
$14,307
PSMO 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JULU | PSMO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $883 | $436 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $3,394 | $1,621 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $9,792 | $4,515 |
- 0.74%JULU
- 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds
JULU 18th cheapest of 51 funds
JULU vs PSMO Dividends
- JULU None
- PSMO None
Distribution history
JULU vs PSMO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JULU 9.7%PSMO 5.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- JULU 0.72PSMO 1.31
- Worst fall
- JULU −12.4%PSMO −9.8%
- Market sensitivity
- JULU 0.80PSMO 0.41
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.