Skip to content
etf.net

JULV vs PSFD

VanEck U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July

JULV—NYSE Arca

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

PSFDBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PSFD −0.01pt a year

JULV0.50%PSFD0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

JULV 578.8×the volume

JULV524KPSFD905

JULV vs PSFD Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.2%JULV−0.2%PSFD

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. JULV −0.2%. PSFD −0.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0.25%0.5%0.75%1%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
JULV 0.50%
PSFD 0.49%, better
Fund size
JULV $77M
PSFD $60M
1Y total return
JULV No data
PSFD +11.4%
Holdings
JULV 3
PSFD 4
Avg volume (30D)
JULV 524K sh, better
PSFD 905 sh
NAV per share
JULV $30.78
PSFD $40.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

  • —JULVNot yet graded
PSFD: Cost 85, Risk 30, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings not scored, Durability 69.
Pillar letters and Scores for JULV, PSFD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJULVPSFD
Cost30% weightNot scoredA85
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightNot scoredD30
Tradability15% weightNot scoredC45
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightNot scoredB69

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

How we build Categories ›

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFD ranks 2nd of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 61
  4. JULVNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JULV—VanEck U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July

PSFDBPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

In short

JULV No data

PSFD Absorbs the first 20% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each 12-month period, with your upside capped in exchange. One of the original 2020 Pacer/Swan buffer funds, and priced under most deep-buffer rivals.

Stated mandate

JULV No data

PSFD The fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while mitigating specified downside losses through a structured buffer strategy over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

JULV No data

  • PSFD 0.49% a year versus a 0.74% median for 20%-buffer S&P 500 funds, undercutting the AllianzIM month-series lineup (JANW, APRW, JUNW). When upside is capped, fees come straight out of the ceiling.
  • Deep cushion, clean reset: FLEX options are structured to absorb the first 20% of underlying losses over the roughly one-year period, with a new cap struck at the start of each period.paceretfs.com
  • Siblings run the same recipe on other calendars (PSFM in April, PSFJ in July), so start dates can be staggered instead of pinned to one January strike. Standing sits in the upper half of the deep-buffer group.

Worth knowing

JULV No data

  • PSFD Thinly traded. Spreads can be wider and larger orders harder to fill than in the giants of the buffer aisle.
  • No income stream: the fund holds options on an S&P 500 tracker rather than the stocks, and it has not paid a distribution.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap run start to finish of the period and are set before fees and expenses. Shares bought mid-period carry different remaining cushion and headroom.paceretfs.com

Full JULV profile⁠

Full PSFD profile⁠

JULV vs PSFD Holdings

As of

How JULV and PSFD differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of JULV and 0.0% of PSFD.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for JULV.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in JULV and PSFD, widest gap first
CountryMore in JULVMore in PSFD
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • JULV102.8%
  • PSFD102.6%

Securities held

  • JULV2
  • PSFD3

Asset class

JULV
Equity
PSFD
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in JULV2
  • In both0
  • Only in PSFD3

Only in JULV

2 securities, 100% of JULV by weight

  • Spy 06/30/2027 7.63 C97.94%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 763.47 P3.90%

Only in PSFD

3 securities, 100% of PSFD by weight

  • Spy 12/31/2026 7.64 C101.88%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 681.92 P0.45%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 409.15 P0.03%

Weight gaps

JULV and PSFD share no securities.

All JULV holdings⁠All 7 PSFD holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JULV vs PSFD Cost

Overpaying JULV vs PSFD

$187

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JULV 0.50%

    $9,979

  • PSFD 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JULV 0.50%
  • PSFD 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530JULV $9,979PSFD $9,792

Year by year

YearJULVPSFDOverpaying
10$900$883$17
20$3,460$3,394$66
30$9,979$9,792$187

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%JULV
  • 0.49%PSFD, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFD cheapest of 24 funds

JULV 5th cheapest of 24 funds

JULV vs PSFD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
JULV None
PSFD None

Distribution history

JULVAll JULV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFDAll PSFD payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JULV vs PSFD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JULV No dataPSFD 7.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JULV No dataPSFD 1.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JULV No dataPSFD −14.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JULV 0.00PSFD 0.56

JULV and PSFD in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • JULV—vsBALTB

    VanEck U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSFDBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JULV—vsPSFJB

    VanEck U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSFDBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JULV—vsPSFOB

    VanEck U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSFDBvsPSFOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.