Skip to content
etf.net

JUNP vs XTR

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - June

JUNPBCboe

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

XTR −0.25pt a year

JUNP0.50%XTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

JUNP 18.4×the volume

JUNP30.2KXTR1.64K

JUNP vs XTR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+6.4%JUNP+7.5%XTR

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. JUNP +6.4%. XTR +7.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%0%2.5%10%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
JUNP 0.50%
XTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
JUNP $103M
XTR $5M
1Y total return
JUNP +6.4%
XTR +7.5%, better
Yield (12M)
JUNP No data
XTR 16.51%
Holdings
JUNP 4
XTR 505
Avg volume (30D)
JUNP 30.2K sh, better
XTR 1.64K sh
NAV per share
JUNP $32.15
XTR $28.54
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JUNP: Cost 91, Risk 36, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings not scored, Durability 47. XTR: Cost 100, Risk 18, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 85, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for JUNP, XTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJUNPXTR
Cost30% weightA91A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD36HigherF18
Tradability15% weightD39HigherF13
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA85
Durability5% weightC47HigherC46

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JUNP and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

JUNP ranks 7th and XTR 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 5BJANPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - JanuaryScore 64
  2. Rank 7BJUNPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - JuneScore 63
  3. Rank 7BPQXPGIM S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer 10 ETFScore 63
  4. Rank 57CXIDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - DecemberScore 40
  5. Rank 57CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JUNPBPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - June

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

In short

JUNP No data

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

Stated mandate

JUNP No data

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

JUNP No data

  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov

Worth knowing

JUNP No data

  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.

Full JUNP profile⁠

Full XTR profile⁠

JUNP vs XTR Holdings

How JUNP and XTR differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of JUNP and 0.0% of XTR.

Level by level

  • Asset classAlternatives, Equity0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%

Sector

No Sector split for JUNP.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for JUNP.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • JUNP102.2%
  • XTR37.0%

Securities held

  • JUNP3
  • XTR504

Asset class

JUNP
Alternatives
XTR
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in JUNP3
  • In both0
  • Only in XTR504

Only in JUNP

3 securities, 100% of JUNP by weight

  • 4SPY Us 05/28/27 C7.5697.35%
  • 4SPY Us 05/28/27 P756.484.06%
  • Net Current Assets<0.01%

Only in XTR

504 securities, 99.8% of XTR by weight

  • Apple Inc7.66%
  • NVIDIA Corp7.54%
  • Microsoft Corp5.89%

Weight gaps

JUNP and XTR share no securities.

All JUNP holdings⁠All 503 XTR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JUNP vs XTR Cost

Overpaying JUNP vs XTR

$4,820

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JUNP 0.50%

    $9,979

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JUNP 0.50%
  • XTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530JUNP $9,979XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearJUNPXTROverpaying
10$900$455$445
20$3,460$1,769$1,691
30$9,979$5,159$4,820

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%JUNP
  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

JUNP 5th cheapest of 77 funds

JUNP vs XTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
JUNP No data
XTR 16.51%
Payout (12M)
JUNP None
XTR $4.69
Last payment
JUNP No data
XTR $0.08
Ex-dividend
JUNP No data
XTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
JUNP No data
XTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
JUNP No data
XTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

JUNPAll JUNP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

JUNP vs XTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JUNP 5.9%since Jul 2024XTR 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JUNP 0.99since Jul 2024XTR 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JUNP −11.2%since Jun 2024XTR −20.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JUNP 0.45XTR 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • JUNPBvsZALTA

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - June · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XTRCvsZALTA

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JUNPBvsAUGPB

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - June · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JUNPBvsTENJB

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - June · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XTRCvsTENJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.