XLF ranks 1st and KBWD 17th of 18 funds in the Financials (Broad) Category.
KBWD vs XLF
XLF −5.31pt a year
5.39%0.08%
XLF 57.5×the volume
574K33M
XLF +9.9pt
+3.3%+13.2%
KBWD vs XLF Performance
−9.7%+52.9%
- KBWD 5.39%
- XLF 0.08%, better
- KBWD $332M
- XLF $53.1B
- KBWD −10.2%
- XLF +9.6%, better
- KBWD 16.12%, better
- XLF 1.46%
- KBWD 38
- XLF 79
- KBWD 574K sh
- XLF 33M sh, better
- KBWD $10.56
- XLF $56.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KBWD | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | F13 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | D34 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | A70Higher | C42 |
| Durability | C50 | A81Higher |
Rank among Financials (Broad) funds
Same Category. KBWD and XLF are both graded against the same 18 Financials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KBWDF
XLFA
In short
KBWD Most financials ETFs are a bet on big banks. KBWD flips the screen and picks financial companies on dividend yield instead, packing about 40 of them into a monthly-paying portfolio. It has run that playbook since 2010.
XLF The 1998 original. XLF holds the S&P 500's financial sector, roughly 80 banks, insurers, card networks and exchanges, for 0.08% a year. Not the whole sector, the blue-chip end of it, and one of the most heavily traded ways to own it.
Stated mandate
KBWD The Fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in publicly listed financial companies selected for competitive dividend yields.
XLF The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Financial Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KBWD vs XLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KBWD vs XLF Cost
Overpaying KBWD vs XLF
$58,286
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KBWD 5.39%
$59,975
XLF 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KBWD | XLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $7,940 | $147 | $7,793 |
| 20 | $24,933 | $575 | $24,358 |
| 30 | $59,975 | $1,689 | $58,286 |
- 5.39%KBWD
- 0.08%XLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Financials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
XLF cheapest of 18 funds
KBWD 18th cheapest of 18 funds
KBWD vs XLF Dividends
- KBWD 16.12%, better
- XLF 1.46%
- KBWD $1.70
- XLF $0.83
- KBWD $0.13
- XLF $0.20
- KBWD Oct 19, 2026
- XLF Sep 21, 2026
- KBWD Oct 23, 2026
- XLF Sep 23, 2026
- KBWD Monthly
- XLF Quarterly
Distribution history
KBWD vs XLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- KBWD
- XLF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KBWD 16.2%XLF 15.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- KBWD 0.08XLF 1.13, better
- Worst fall
- KBWD −30.7%XLF −25.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- KBWD 0.80XLF 0.75
KBWD and XLF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 5.39% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 5.39% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 5.39% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





