XLF ranks 1st and VFH 4th of 18 funds in the Financials (Broad) Category.
VFH vs XLF
XLF −0.01pt a year
0.09%0.08%
XLF 57.0×the volume
579K33M
XLF +0.3pt
+12.9%+13.2%
VFH vs XLF Performance
+52.3%+52.9%
- VFH 0.09%
- XLF 0.08%, better
- VFH $13.9B
- XLF $53.1B
- VFH +9.6%
- XLF +9.6%
- VFH 1.71%, better
- XLF 1.46%
- VFH 426
- XLF 79
- VFH 579K sh
- XLF 33M sh, better
- VFH $137.29
- XLF $56.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | VFH | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | C53 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | B56 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | C53Higher | C42 |
| Durability | A84Higher | A81 |
Rank among Financials (Broad) funds
Same Category. VFH and XLF are both graded against the same 18 Financials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
VFHB
XLFA
In short
VFH Financials without the size filter. VFH holds roughly 400 US financial stocks, from the megabanks down to small regional lenders and insurers, for 0.09% a year.
XLF The 1998 original. XLF holds the S&P 500's financial sector, roughly 80 banks, insurers, card networks and exchanges, for 0.08% a year. Not the whole sector, the blue-chip end of it, and one of the most heavily traded ways to own it.
Stated mandate
VFH VFH seeks to track the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Financials 25/50, providing passively managed, multicapitalization exposure to U.S. financial-sector equities.
XLF The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Financial Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
VFH vs XLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
VFH vs XLF Cost
Overpaying VFH vs XLF
$209
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
VFH 0.09%
$1,898
XLF 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | VFH | XLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $147 | $18 |
| 20 | $646 | $575 | $71 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $1,689 | $209 |
- 0.09%VFH
- 0.08%XLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Financials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
XLF cheapest of 18 funds
VFH 3rd cheapest of 18 funds
VFH vs XLF Dividends
- VFH 1.71%, better
- XLF 1.46%
- VFH $2.35
- XLF $0.83
- VFH $0.45
- XLF $0.20
- VFH Sep 23, 2026
- XLF Sep 21, 2026
- VFH Sep 25, 2026
- XLF Sep 23, 2026
- VFH Quarterly
- XLF Quarterly
Distribution history
VFH vs XLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- VFH
- XLF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- VFH 15.9%XLF 15.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- VFH 1.11XLF 1.13, better
- Worst fall
- VFH −25.7%, betterXLF −25.8%
- Market sensitivity
- VFH 0.82XLF 0.75
VFH and XLF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





