LQDW ranks 1st and KLIP 19th of 25 funds in the Index Option Income Category.
KLIP vs LQDW
LQDW −0.60pt a year
0.94%0.34%
LQDW 3.3×the volume
32.2K107K
LQDW +2.1pt
+3.1%+5.2%
KLIP vs LQDW Performance
−19.0%+2.0%
- KLIP 0.94%
- LQDW 0.34%, better
- KLIP $81M
- LQDW $353M
- KLIP −19.0%
- LQDW +2.0%, better
- KLIP 30.72%, better
- LQDW 12.38%
- KLIP 2
- LQDW 3192
- KLIP 32.2K sh
- LQDW 107K sh, better
- KLIP $20.68
- LQDW $22.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KLIP | LQDW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D33 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A70 | A94Higher |
| Risk | F24 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | D35 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | D33 | A100Higher |
| Durability | C54 | A82Higher |
Rank among Index Option Income funds
Same Category. KLIP and LQDW are both graded against the same 25 Index Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KLIPD
LQDWA
In short
KLIP Covered calls, pointed at China internet stocks. KLIP owns KWEB and sells calls on it, turning one of the world's jumpiest equity baskets into option premium, paid out monthly. Fat premiums are the draw; a lid on sharp rebounds is the trade.
LQDW Covered calls, but on bonds. LQDW owns iShares' flagship investment-grade corporate bond fund and writes monthly calls against it, paying distributions monthly, at less than half the option-income cohort's median fee.
Stated mandate
KLIP KLIP uses a covered-call strategy by purchasing shares of KWEB and selling corresponding call options on that underlying ETF.
LQDW The fund seeks to track a strategy holding LQD while writing monthly covered calls to generate income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KLIP vs LQDW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KLIP vs LQDW Cost
Overpaying KLIP vs LQDW
$10,772
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KLIP 0.94%
$17,704
LQDW 0.34%
$6,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KLIP | LQDW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,661 | $616 | $1,045 |
| 20 | $6,260 | $2,386 | $3,874 |
| 30 | $17,704 | $6,932 | $10,772 |
- 0.94%KLIP
- 0.34%LQDW, cheaper
- Middle half of Index Option Income funds
- Median 0.81%
LQDW cheapest of 25 funds
KLIP 17th cheapest of 25 funds
KLIP vs LQDW Dividends
- KLIP 30.72%, better
- LQDW 12.38%
- KLIP $6.32
- LQDW $2.83
- KLIP $0.42
- LQDW $0.38
- KLIP Oct 29, 2026
- LQDW Oct 2, 2026
- KLIP Oct 30, 2026
- LQDW Oct 7, 2026
- KLIP Monthly
- LQDW Monthly
Distribution history
KLIP vs LQDW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KLIP 14.7%LQDW 4.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- KLIP −0.02LQDW 0.16, better
- Worst fall
- KLIP −21.4%LQDW −9.2%
- Market sensitivity
- KLIP 0.34LQDW 0.59
KLIP and LQDW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.94% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

