Skip to content

KOCT vs SMAY

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF

KOCTBCboe

FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - May

SMAYDCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

KOCT −0.11pt a year

KOCT0.79%SMAY0.90%

Avg volume · 30D

KOCT 4.1×the volume

KOCT29.1KSMAY7.11K

3Y return · a year

KOCT +3.0pt

KOCT+13.4%SMAY+10.4%

KOCT vs SMAY Performance

Nov 5, 2025 – Nov 5, 2026

+12.4%KOCT+7.1%SMAY

Nov 5, 2025 to Nov 5, 2026. KOCT +12.4%. SMAY +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%15%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
KOCT 0.79%, better
SMAY 0.90%
Fund size
KOCT $173M
SMAY $112M
1Y total return
KOCT +12.4%, better
SMAY +7.1%
Yield (12M)
KOCT 0.00%
SMAY No data
Holdings
KOCT 3
SMAY 3
Avg volume (30D)
KOCT 29.1K sh, better
SMAY 7.11K sh
NAV per share
KOCT $38.24
SMAY $28.05
52W range

ETF.net Grade

KOCT: Cost 40, Risk 59, Mission 89, Tradability 81, Holdings not scored, Durability 87. SMAY: Cost 8, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 29, Holdings 60, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for KOCT, SMAY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarKOCTSMAY
Cost30% weightC40HigherF8
Mission25% weightA89Not scored
Risk15% weightB59HigherC45
Tradability15% weightA81HigherD29
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB60
Durability5% weightA87HigherA79

Rank among Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. KOCT and SMAY are both graded against the same 14 Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Russell 2000 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

KOCT ranks 3rd and SMAY 14th of 14 funds in the Russell 2000 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBKFAllianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BQBKVAllianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BKOCTInnovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4CKAPRInnovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - AprilScore 52
  5. Rank 13DSNOVFT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 35
  6. Rank 14DSMAYFT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - MayScore 26

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

KOCTBInnovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF

SMAYDFT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - May

In short

KOCT Small-cap exposure with a seatbelt. KOCT tracks IWM up to a yearly cap while absorbing the first 15% of losses, resetting each October 1. A 2019 original in a corner where most buffer funds are built on the S&P 500.

SMAY Small caps with a seatbelt. SMAY absorbs the first 15% of a price decline in the Russell 2000 ETF over each one-year outcome period, trading that cushion for a ceiling on the upside. The clock resets every May.

Stated mandate

KOCT The Fund seeks to track the return of the iShares Russell 2000 ETF, subject to a predetermined upside cap, while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

SMAY The Fund seeks price-return participation in the iShares Russell 2000 ETF up to a 19.15% cap, while protecting the first 15% of losses during the May 18, 2026–May 21, 2027 outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • KOCT The contract is plain: track the iShares Russell 2000 ETF up to a preset cap, with the first 15% of losses over the one-year outcome period absorbed first.innovatoretfs.com
  • Rare air: it listed October 1, 2019 in Innovator's first small-cap buffer wave. Most defined-outcome ETFs wrap the S&P 500, not the Russell 2000.accessnewswire.com
  • Fee lands at 0.79%, the middle of its small-cap buffer group, and the fund rates in the upper half of that group on our review.
  • You pick your calendar. This is the October reset; siblings KJAN, KAPR and KJUL run the same 15% buffer off other quarters.
  • SMAY The 15% buffer is written into the fund's design, not a target: over a full outcome period it takes the first 15% of a price drop in the iShares Russell 2000 ETF before you feel it.
  • Defined-outcome mechanics point at small caps, a corner of the buffer market where the field is thin and the reference is a single, widely held Russell 2000 fund.
  • The May start date lets you stagger entry across the calendar alongside other dated small-cap buffer funds (KJAN, KAPR, KJUL, KOCT) instead of betting on one reset month.
  • What's inside matches what's on the label: options tied to one reference fund, no drift, no side bets.

Worth knowing

  • KOCT The cap is the price of the cushion. A blistering small-cap year gets trimmed, and the cap is reset for each new outcome period starting October 1.
  • Timing matters: Innovator notes the stated outcomes apply to holders from the first day of the outcome period through the last. Buy mid-period and your own cap and buffer differ.innovatoretfs.com
  • Trading is light versus mainstream small-cap funds, and the options-based structure isn't built to throw off income.
  • SMAY The buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Buy in the middle and you get whatever cushion and headroom are left, not the stated 15%.
  • At 0.90% a year, it sits above the 0.79% charged by the Innovator small-cap buffer funds running the same playbook.
  • It trades lightly, so spreads at the point of entry or exit can matter more than they would in a busier fund.

Full KOCT profile⁠

Full SMAY profile⁠

KOCT vs SMAY Holdings

How KOCT and SMAY differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

About this figure: SMAY holds other funds. We compare those funds, not the stocks inside them.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors98.6%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in KOCT and SMAY, widest gap first
SectorMore in KOCTMore in SMAYGap
IndustrialsSMAY +0.7 points
EnergyKOCT +0.5 points
Consumer DiscretionaryKOCT +0.5 points
TechnologySMAY +0.4 points
FinancialsKOCT +0.2 points
MaterialsSMAY +0.2 points
Health CareKOCT +0.1 points
UtilitiesKOCT +0.1 points
CommunicationSMAY +0.1 points
Real EstateSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in KOCT and SMAY, widest gap first
CountryMore in KOCTMore in SMAYGap
United StatesSame weight
BrazilSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
CanadaSame weight
United KingdomSame weight
TaiwanSame weight
NorwaySame weight
SingaporeSame weight
Other countries (5)Same weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • KOCT105.0%
  • SMAY102.3%

Securities held

  • KOCT3
  • SMAY2

Asset class

KOCT
Stocks
SMAY
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in KOCT3
  • In both0
  • Only in SMAY2

Only in KOCT

3 securities, 100% of KOCT by weight

  • Iwm 09/30/2027 2.78 C99.11%
  • Iwm 09/30/2027 277.89 P5.53%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.32%

Only in SMAY

2 securities, 100% of SMAY by weight

  • 2027-05-21 iShares Russell 2000 ETF C 2.7897.45%
  • 2027-05-21 iShares Russell 2000 ETF P 277.604.04%

Weight gaps

KOCT and SMAY share no securities.

All 6 KOCT holdings⁠All 4 SMAY holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KOCT vs SMAY Cost

Overpaying SMAY vs KOCT

$1,866

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • KOCT 0.79%

    $15,174

  • SMAY 0.90%

    $17,040

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • KOCT 0.79%
  • SMAY 0.90%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530SMAY $17,040KOCT $15,174

Year by year

YearKOCTSMAYOverpaying
10$1,405$1,593$188
20$5,331$6,015$684
30$15,174$17,040$1,866

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%KOCT, cheaper
  • 0.90%SMAY
  • Middle half of Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.77%

KOCT 8th cheapest of 14 funds

SMAY 12th cheapest of 14 funds

KOCT vs SMAY Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Yield (12M)
KOCT 0.00%
SMAY No data
Payout (12M)
KOCT None
SMAY None

Distribution history

Per share, 2019, same scale for both

KOCT1 paymentAll KOCT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2019. Nov 19, 2019 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202019
SMAYAll SMAY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

KOCT vs SMAY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
KOCT 8.8%, betterSMAY 9.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
KOCT 1.17, betterSMAY 0.82
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
KOCT −16.6%SMAY −14.5%since May 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
KOCT 0.63SMAY 0.58

Popular comparisons

  • KOCTBvsQBKFB

    Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF · Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMAYDvsQBKFB

    FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - May · Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KOCTBvsQBKVB

    Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF · Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMAYDvsQBKVB

    FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - May · Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KOCTBvsKAPRC

    Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMAYDvsKAPRC

    FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - May · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.