QBKF ranks 1st and SMAY 14th of 14 funds in the Russell 2000 Buffer 15% Category.
QBKF vs SMAY
QBKF −0.16pt a year
0.74%0.90%
SMAY 4.1×the volume
1.72K7.11K
QBKF vs SMAY Performance
−0.8%−4.4%
- QBKF 0.74%, better
- SMAY 0.90%
- QBKF $9M
- SMAY $112M
- QBKF
- SMAY +7.1%
- QBKF 3
- SMAY 3
- QBKF 1.72K sh
- SMAY 7.11K sh, better
- QBKF $26.26
- SMAY $28.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QBKF | SMAY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A73Higher | F8 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A88Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | D38Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | B56 | B60Higher |
| Durability | D25 | A79Higher |
Rank among Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. QBKF and SMAY are both graded against the same 14 Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QBKFB
SMAYD
In short
SMAY Small caps with a seatbelt. SMAY absorbs the first 15% of a price decline in the Russell 2000 ETF over each one-year outcome period, trading that cushion for a ceiling on the upside. The clock resets every May.
Stated mandate
SMAY The Fund seeks price-return participation in the iShares Russell 2000 ETF up to a 19.15% cap, while protecting the first 15% of losses during the May 18, 2026–May 21, 2027 outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QBKF vs SMAY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QBKF vs SMAY Cost
Overpaying SMAY vs QBKF
$2,733
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QBKF 0.74%
$14,307
SMAY 0.90%
$17,040
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QBKF | SMAY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $1,593 | $274 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $6,015 | $1,000 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $17,040 | $2,733 |
- 0.74%QBKF, cheaper
- 0.90%SMAY
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.77%
QBKF 6th cheapest of 14 funds
SMAY 12th cheapest of 14 funds
QBKF vs SMAY Dividends
- QBKF None
- SMAY None
Distribution history
QBKF vs SMAY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QBKF SMAY 9.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- QBKF SMAY 0.82
- Worst fall
- QBKF SMAY −14.5%
- Market sensitivity
- QBKF 0.12SMAY 0.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.