SCO ranks 1st and KOLD 3rd of 5 funds in the Inverse Energy Category.
KOLD vs SCO
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
SCO 1.8×the volume
2.89M5.23M
KOLD +20.6pt
−21.0%−41.6%
KOLD vs SCO Performance
−52.8%−94.0%
- KOLD 0.95%
- SCO 0.95%
- KOLD $55M
- SCO $841M
- KOLD +3.9%, better
- SCO −78.3%
- KOLD 1
- SCO 1
- KOLD 2.89M sh
- SCO 5.23M sh, better
- KOLD $33.50
- SCO $15.46
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KOLD | SCO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65 | B65 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C40Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | C52 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C54 | B67Higher |
Rank among Inverse Energy funds
Same Category. KOLD and SCO are both graded against the same 5 Inverse Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KOLDB
SCOB
In short
KOLD Natural gas is the most temperamental commodity on the board, and KOLD is the instrument built to lean against it: two times the inverse of the Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex, reset every single day.
SCO A 2008-vintage double-short on crude: built to deliver -2x the daily move of a balanced WTI crude oil index. Cheaper than most bear-energy rivals, heavily traded, and it resets every day.
Stated mandate
KOLD The fund seeks daily results equal to two times the inverse performance of the Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex.
SCO SCO seeks daily pre-fee results corresponding to negative two times the daily performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KOLD vs SCO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KOLD vs SCO Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KOLD 0.95%
$17,869
SCO 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KOLD | SCO |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%KOLD
- 0.95%SCO
- Middle half of Inverse Energy funds
- Median 0.95%
KOLD cheapest of 5 funds
SCO cheapest of 5 funds
KOLD vs SCO Dividends
- KOLD None
- SCO None
Distribution history
KOLD vs SCO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- KOLD
- SCO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KOLD 103.3%SCO 49.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- KOLD 0.58, betterSCO −0.84
- Worst fall
- KOLD −96.4%SCO −95.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- KOLD −3.29SCO −2.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 1.01%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 1.01%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.