Skip to content
etf.net

KPO vs WX

Kensington Premium Opportunities Etf

KPO—Cboe

Corgi All World 2x Daily ETF

WXCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

WX −0.75pt a year

KPO0.95%WX0.20%

Avg volume · 30D

KPO 58.6×the volume

KPO16.7KWX285

KPO vs WX Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−3.4%KPO−4.4%WX

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. KPO −3.4%. WX −4.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%0%2%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
KPO 0.95%
WX 0.20%, better
Fund size
KPO $11M
WX $1M
Holdings
KPO 7
WX 1
Avg volume (30D)
KPO 16.7K sh, better
WX 285 sh
NAV per share
KPO $24.01
WX $22.96
52W range

ETF.net Grade

  • —KPONot yet graded
WX: Cost 100, Risk 71, Mission not scored, Tradability 31, Holdings not scored, Durability 23.
Pillar letters and Scores for KPO, WX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarKPOWX
Cost30% weightNot scoredA100
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightNot scoredA71
Tradability15% weightNot scoredD31
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightNot scoredF23

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

How we build Categories ›

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

WX ranks 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 37CWLDULeverage Shares 2x Long World SScore 40
  2. Rank 37CWXCorgi All World 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  3. Rank 37CXBIXCorgi U.S. Biotech 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  4. KPONot yet graded

KPO vs WX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KPO vs WX Cost

Overpaying KPO vs WX

$13,714

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • KPO 0.95%

    $17,869

  • WX 0.20%

    $4,155

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • KPO 0.95%
  • WX 0.20%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530KPO $17,869WX $4,155

Year by year

YearKPOWXOverpaying
10$1,678$365$1,313
20$6,322$1,421$4,901
30$17,869$4,155$13,714

Expense ratio

  • 0.95%KPO
  • 0.20%WX, cheaper
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

WX cheapest of 95 funds

KPO 32nd cheapest of 95 funds

KPO vs WX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
KPO None
WX None

Distribution history

KPOAll KPO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

WXAll WX payments⁠

No distribution history available.

KPO vs WX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
KPO 0.00WX 2.76

Popular comparisons

  • KPO—vsQLDA

    Kensington Premium Opportunities Etf · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • WXCvsQLDA

    Corgi All World 2x Daily ETF · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • KPO—vsUYGA

    Kensington Premium Opportunities Etf · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • WXCvsUYGA

    Corgi All World 2x Daily ETF · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • KPO—vsROMA

    Kensington Premium Opportunities Etf · ProShares Ultra Technology

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • WXCvsROMA

    Corgi All World 2x Daily ETF · ProShares Ultra Technology

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.