Skip to content

KQQQ vs TMED

Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF

KQQQDNasdaq

T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

TMEDBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

TMED −0.55pt a year

KQQQ0.99%TMED0.44%

Avg volume · 30D

KQQQ 6.4×the volume

KQQQ47.6KTMED7.43K

KQQQ vs TMED Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+2.4%KQQQ+20.6%TMED

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. KQQQ +2.4%. TMED +20.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%10%30%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
KQQQ 0.99%
TMED 0.44%, better
Fund size
KQQQ $121M
TMED $34M
1Y total return
KQQQ +2.4%
TMED +20.6%, better
Yield (12M)
KQQQ 16.89%
TMED No data
Holdings
KQQQ 33
TMED 112
Avg volume (30D)
KQQQ 47.6K sh, better
TMED 7.43K sh
NAV per share
KQQQ $26.24
TMED $34.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

KQQQ: Cost 9, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 31, Durability 55. TMED: Cost 82, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 91, Durability 35.
Pillar letters and Scores for KQQQ, TMED, with each pillar’s weight
PillarKQQQTMED
Cost30% weightF9A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF24B55Higher
Tradability15% weightB65HigherB59
Holdings10% weightD31A91Higher
Durability5% weightB55HigherD35

Rank among US Active Sector funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. KQQQ and TMED are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Sector⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

TMED ranks 2nd and KQQQ 32nd of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVREAvantis Real Estate ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2APSRInvesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 2BTMEDT. Rowe Price Health Care ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4ATRUTVanEck Technology TruSector ETFScore 69
  5. Rank 30DTNGYTortoise Energy FundScore 36
  6. Rank 32DKQQQKurv Technology Titans Select ETFScore 29
  7. Rank 32DMEDXHorizon Kinetics Medical ETFScore 29

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

KQQQDKurv Technology Titans Select ETF

TMEDBT. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

In short

KQQQ The Nasdaq-100's tech, with the non-tech names stripped out: about 40 large technology companies, actively managed, with an options overlay that pays monthly. Fee is 0.99% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.

TMED No data

Stated mandate

KQQQ The Fund seeks maximum total return through active management of high-conviction technology exposure while also pursuing potentially tax-efficient income.

TMED No data

Why people hold it

  • KQQQ The purity pitch: it drops the non-technology constituents sitting inside benchmarks like the Nasdaq-100 and concentrates on roughly 40 large tech and growth names instead.businesswire.com
  • The options layer is discretionary, not blanket. Calls get written selectively on names management sees as having limited upside, trading away gains there for premium income.businesswire.comsec.gov
  • Wide toolkit by design: the prospectus permits shares, options tied to individual tech companies above $10 billion in market cap, and shares of other tech ETFs.sec.gov
  • Pays monthly, and the fund discloses that distributions can include return of capital, so you can see what the income is actually made of.

TMED No data

Worth knowing

  • KQQQ At 0.99% net (1.01% gross, net of a waiver through September 30, 2027) it sits above the category median across 35 funds. VanEck's TRUT covers the sector for 0.14%.
  • The income is not a fixed rate. There is no declared target yield, payouts lean on option premiums, and part of a monthly check can be return of capital.kurvinvest.com
  • Launched in 2024, concentrated in one sector, and thinly traded as a smaller fund, so the live record is short and bid-ask spreads can run wider than in giant sector funds.

TMED No data

Full KQQQ profile⁠

Full TMED profile⁠

KQQQ vs TMED Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KQQQ vs TMED Cost

Overpaying KQQQ vs TMED

$9,673

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • KQQQ 0.99%

    $18,525

  • TMED 0.44%

    $8,852

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • KQQQ 0.99%
  • TMED 0.44%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530KQQQ $18,525TMED $8,852

Year by year

YearKQQQTMEDOverpaying
10$1,746$794$952
20$6,565$3,061$3,504
30$18,525$8,852$9,673

Expense ratio

  • 0.99%KQQQ
  • 0.44%TMED, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Sector funds
  • Median 0.61%

TMED 7th cheapest of 35 funds

KQQQ 31st cheapest of 35 funds

KQQQ vs TMED Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
KQQQ 16.89%
TMED No data
Payout (12M)
KQQQ $4.44
TMED No data
Last payment
KQQQ $0.35
TMED $0.16
Ex-dividend
KQQQ Oct 28, 2026
TMED Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
KQQQ Oct 29, 2026
TMED Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
KQQQ Monthly
TMED Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

KQQQMonthly · 27 paymentsAll KQQQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 27 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Aug 21, 2024 $0.09; Sep 25, 2024 $0.15; Oct 23, 2024 $0.14; Nov 20, 2024 $0.15; Dec 24, 2024 $0.15; Jan 23, 2025 $0.15; Feb 26, 2025 $0.15; Mar 26, 2025 $0.15; Apr 23, 2025 $0.25; May 28, 2025 $0.25; Jun 25, 2025 $0.20; Jul 23, 2025 $0.20; Aug 27, 2025 $0.30; Sep 24, 2025 $0.45; Oct 29, 2025 $0.45; Nov 25, 2025 $0.41; Dec 23, 2025 $0.41; Jan 28, 2026 $0.41; Feb 25, 2026 $0.41; Mar 25, 2026 $0.35; Apr 29, 2026 $0.35; May 27, 2026 $0.35; Jun 24, 2026 $0.35; Jul 29, 2026 $0.35; Aug 26, 2026 $0.35; Sep 23, 2026 $0.35; Oct 28, 2026 $0.35. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD
TMEDIrregular · 1 paymentAll TMED payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD

KQQQ vs TMED Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
KQQQ 22.0%since Aug 2024TMED 14.7%since Jul 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
KQQQ 0.61since Aug 2024TMED 1.50since Jul 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
KQQQ −26.2%since Jul 2024TMED −11.1%since Jun 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
KQQQ 1.48TMED 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • KQQQDvsAVREA

    Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMEDBvsAVREA

    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KQQQDvsPSRA

    Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMEDBvsPSRA

    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KQQQDvsTRUTA

    Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF · VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMEDBvsTRUTA

    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF · VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.