Skip to content
etf.net

TMED vs TRUT

T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

TMEDBNasdaq

VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

TRUTANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

TRUT −0.30pt a year

TMED0.44%TRUT0.14%

Avg volume · 30D

TRUT 24.5×the volume

TMED7.43KTRUT182K

TMED vs TRUT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+20.6%TMED+12.7%TRUT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. TMED +20.6%. TRUT +12.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−10%0%30%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
TMED 0.44%
TRUT 0.14%, better
Fund size
TMED $34M
TRUT $238M
1Y total return
TMED +20.6%, better
TRUT +12.7%
Yield (12M)
TMED No data
TRUT 0.35%
Holdings
TMED 112
TRUT 77
Avg volume (30D)
TMED 7.43K sh
TRUT 182K sh, better
NAV per share
TMED $34.31
TRUT $31.15
52W range

ETF.net Grade

TMED: Cost 82, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 91, Durability 35. TRUT: Cost 93, Risk 23, Mission not scored, Tradability 96, Holdings 31, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for TMED, TRUT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarTMEDTRUT
Cost30% weightA82A93Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB55HigherF23
Tradability15% weightB59A96Higher
Holdings10% weightA91HigherD31
Durability5% weightD35B61Higher

Rank among US Active Sector funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. TMED and TRUT are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Sector⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

TMED ranks 2nd and TRUT 4th of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVREAvantis Real Estate ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2APSRInvesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 2BTMEDT. Rowe Price Health Care ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4ATRUTVanEck Technology TruSector ETFScore 69
  5. Rank 5BUTESVirtus Reaves Utilities ETFScore 66

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

TMEDBT. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

TRUTAVanEck Technology TruSector ETF

In short

TMED No data

TRUT Diversification rules force most tech ETFs to trim their biggest names. TRUT's answer: own the giants directly up to the legal line, then top up with sector ETFs so the portfolio mirrors the sector's real shape.

Stated mandate

TMED No data

TRUT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through active investment in securities of information technology-related companies or instruments providing exposure to them.

Why people hold it

TMED No data

  • TRUT The mechanism is the point. Fund rules cap one stock at 25% and stocks above 5% at 50% combined; TRUT fills the gap with targeted sector ETFs instead of overweighting smaller names.vaneck.comvaneck.com 2
  • 0.14% a year for an actively managed fund, against a median near 0.65% across active US equity peers. Cheap enough to sit alongside index products.
  • One of the two originals in VanEck's TruSector line, launched in 2025. The approach has since been extended across all 11 GICS sectors.vaneck.comvaneck.com 2
  • About 80 positions, quarterly distributions, and steady day-to-day trading. On cost and tradability it lands in the upper tier of its active US equity cohort.

Worth knowing

TMED No data

  • TRUT Part of the exposure arrives through other ETFs rather than shares the fund holds outright. That is the workaround that makes uncapped weights possible, and it adds a layer.vaneck.com
  • Uncapped means concentrated. Leaning fully into tech's largest companies ties results to a handful of mega-caps more tightly than a capped sector fund would.vaneck.com
  • Launched August 2025, so there is only a short record of how closely the hybrid build actually shadows an uncapped tech benchmark.

Full TMED profile⁠

Full TRUT profile⁠

TMED vs TRUT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

TMED vs TRUT Cost

Overpaying TMED vs TRUT

$5,920

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • TMED 0.44%

    $8,852

  • TRUT 0.14%

    $2,932

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • TMED 0.44%
  • TRUT 0.14%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530TMED $8,852TRUT $2,932

Year by year

YearTMEDTRUTOverpaying
10$794$256$538
20$3,061$1,000$2,061
30$8,852$2,932$5,920

Expense ratio

  • 0.44%TMED
  • 0.14%TRUT, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Sector funds
  • Median 0.61%

TRUT 3rd cheapest of 35 funds

TMED 7th cheapest of 35 funds

TMED vs TRUT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
TMED No data
TRUT 0.35%
Payout (12M)
TMED No data
TRUT $0.11
Last payment
TMED $0.16
TRUT $0.03
Ex-dividend
TMED Dec 23, 2025
TRUT Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
TMED Dec 26, 2025
TRUT Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
TMED Irregular
TRUT Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

TMEDIrregular · 1 paymentAll TMED payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD
TRUTQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll TRUT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Oct 1, 2025 $0.01; Dec 29, 2025 $0.02; Apr 1, 2026 $0.03; Jul 1, 2026 $0.03; Oct 1, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD

TMED vs TRUT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
TMED 14.7%since Jul 2025TRUT 26.8%since Sep 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
TMED 1.50since Jul 2025TRUT 0.78since Sep 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
TMED −11.1%since Jun 2025TRUT −18.6%since Aug 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
TMED 0.46TRUT 1.76

Popular comparisons

  • TMEDBvsAVREA

    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TRUTAvsAVREA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TMEDBvsPSRA

    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TRUTAvsPSRA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TMEDBvsUTESB

    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF · Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TRUTAvsUTESB

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.