KWIN ranks 1st and MSFY 9th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.
KWIN vs MSFY
KWIN −0.48pt a year
0.51%0.99%
MSFY 1.4×the volume
14.3K20.7K
KWIN vs MSFY Performance
+3.7%+1.6%
- KWIN 0.51%, better
- MSFY 0.99%
- KWIN $64M
- MSFY $13M
- KWIN +3.7%, better
- MSFY +1.6%
- KWIN
- MSFY 18.38%
- KWIN 55
- MSFY 6
- KWIN 14.3K sh
- MSFY 20.7K sh, better
- KWIN $25.93
- MSFY $21.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KWIN | MSFY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A77 |
| Mission | C52 | |
| Risk | A87Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | B68 |
| Holdings | B65Higher | D27 |
| Durability | B68Higher | B60 |
Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds
Same Category. KWIN and MSFY are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KWINA
MSFYB
In short
KWIN An income fund built for investors who can't own interest. KWIN holds stocks, then sells calls and buys puts on each one, aiming for a delta-neutral book whose payout comes from options premium instead of a coupon.
MSFY A synthetic covered call on a single name: MSFY holds options on Microsoft rather than the shares, writes calls against them, and pays monthly. Its prospectus allows call expiries out to twelve months, not just next Friday.
Stated mandate
KWIN KWIN seeks alternative option income by holding long positions in selected equities while selling calls and buying puts against each position. The strategy is intended to produce a delta-neutral portfolio and is marketed as an alternative to traditional interest income.
MSFY The Fund seeks current income while providing exposure to Microsoft Corporation’s common-stock returns, subject to limited upside participation. It uses options-based strategies, including a synthetic covered-call strategy, to generate income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KWIN vs MSFY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KWIN vs MSFY Cost
Overpaying MSFY vs KWIN
$8,360
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KWIN 0.51%
$10,165
MSFY 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KWIN | MSFY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $918 | $1,746 | $828 |
| 20 | $3,527 | $6,565 | $3,038 |
| 30 | $10,165 | $18,525 | $8,360 |
- 0.51%KWIN, cheaper
- 0.99%MSFY
- Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
- Median 1.04%
KWIN cheapest of 71 funds
MSFY 9th cheapest of 71 funds
KWIN vs MSFY Dividends
- KWIN
- MSFY 18.38%
- KWIN None
- MSFY $4.05
- KWIN
- MSFY $0.20
- KWIN
- MSFY Oct 14, 2026
- KWIN
- MSFY Oct 15, 2026
- KWIN
- MSFY Monthly
Distribution history
KWIN vs MSFY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KWIN MSFY 25.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- KWIN MSFY 0.32
- Worst fall
- KWIN −1.6%MSFY −35.6%
- Market sensitivity
- KWIN 0.001MSFY 1.16
Popular comparisons
- 0.51% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.