KWIN ranks 1st and PYPY 54th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.
KWIN vs PYPY
KWIN −0.80pt a year
0.51%1.31%
PYPY 1.2×the volume
14.3K17.3K
KWIN vs PYPY Performance
+3.7%−11.9%
- KWIN 0.51%, better
- PYPY 1.31%
- KWIN $64M
- PYPY $24M
- KWIN +3.7%, better
- PYPY −11.9%
- KWIN
- PYPY 53.80%
- KWIN 55
- PYPY 6
- KWIN 14.3K sh
- PYPY 17.3K sh, better
- KWIN $25.93
- PYPY $26.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KWIN | PYPY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F4 |
| Mission | B67 | |
| Risk | A87Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | B65 | |
| Durability | B68Higher | B67 |
Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds
Same Category. KWIN and PYPY are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KWINA
PYPYD
In short
KWIN An income fund built for investors who can't own interest. KWIN holds stocks, then sells calls and buys puts on each one, aiming for a delta-neutral book whose payout comes from options premium instead of a coupon.
PYPY PayPal, rented out. PYPY holds a synthetic long in PYPL and sells call spreads against it, turning option premium into cash income and trading away part of any PayPal rally.
Stated mandate
KWIN KWIN seeks alternative option income by holding long positions in selected equities while selling calls and buying puts against each position. The strategy is intended to produce a delta-neutral portfolio and is marketed as an alternative to traditional interest income.
PYPY The Fund is actively managed to generate weekly income by selling call spreads on PayPal Holdings Inc. (PYPL).
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KWIN vs PYPY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KWIN vs PYPY Cost
Overpaying PYPY vs KWIN
$13,354
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KWIN 0.51%
$10,165
PYPY 1.31%
$23,519
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KWIN | PYPY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $918 | $2,280 | $1,362 |
| 20 | $3,527 | $8,450 | $4,923 |
| 30 | $10,165 | $23,519 | $13,354 |
- 0.51%KWIN, cheaper
- 1.31%PYPY
- Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
- Median 1.04%
KWIN cheapest of 71 funds
PYPY 68th cheapest of 71 funds
KWIN vs PYPY Dividends
- KWIN
- PYPY 53.80%
- KWIN None
- PYPY $14.41
- KWIN
- PYPY $0.28
- KWIN
- PYPY Nov 5, 2026
- KWIN
- PYPY Nov 6, 2026
- KWIN
- PYPY Weekly
Distribution history
KWIN vs PYPY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KWIN PYPY 30.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- KWIN PYPY 0.004
- Worst fall
- KWIN −1.6%PYPY −53.4%
- Market sensitivity
- KWIN 0.001PYPY 0.52
Popular comparisons
- 0.51% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.