KWIN ranks 1st and SMYY 40th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.
KWIN vs SMYY
KWIN −0.67pt a year
0.51%1.18%
SMYY 1.8×the volume
14K24.8K
KWIN vs SMYY Performance
+2.9%−1.8%
- KWIN 0.51%, better
- SMYY 1.18%
- KWIN $63M
- SMYY $6M
- KWIN
- SMYY −31.3%
- KWIN
- SMYY 215.37%
- KWIN 55
- SMYY 6
- KWIN 14K sh
- SMYY 24.8K sh, better
- KWIN $25.90
- SMYY $5.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KWIN | SMYY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F19 |
| Mission | A70 | |
| Risk | A86Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | A88 | |
| Durability | B68Higher | C41 |
Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds
Same Category. KWIN and SMYY are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KWINA
SMYYC
In short
KWIN An income fund built for investors who can't own interest. KWIN holds stocks, then sells calls and buys puts on each one, aiming for a delta-neutral book whose payout comes from options premium instead of a coupon.
SMYY Most single-stock income funds sell calls on the stock. SMYY flips it: the income comes from selling put options on a 2x leveraged SMCI ETF, and the cash goes out monthly.
Stated mandate
KWIN KWIN seeks alternative option income by holding long positions in selected equities while selling calls and buying puts against each position. The strategy is intended to produce a delta-neutral portfolio and is marketed as an alternative to traditional interest income.
SMYY The Fund seeks income primarily by selling put options on leveraged ETFs designed to deliver twice the daily performance of SMCI. It also seeks capped exposure to the performance of that leveraged ETF.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KWIN vs SMYY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KWIN vs SMYY Cost
Overpaying SMYY vs KWIN
$11,378
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KWIN 0.51%
$10,165
SMYY 1.18%
$21,543
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KWIN | SMYY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $918 | $2,065 | $1,147 |
| 20 | $3,527 | $7,697 | $4,170 |
| 30 | $10,165 | $21,543 | $11,378 |
- 0.51%KWIN, cheaper
- 1.18%SMYY
- Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
- Median 1.04%
KWIN cheapest of 71 funds
SMYY 48th cheapest of 71 funds
KWIN vs SMYY Dividends
- KWIN
- SMYY 215.37%
- KWIN None
- SMYY $11.79
- KWIN
- SMYY $0.08
- KWIN
- SMYY Oct 30, 2026
- KWIN
- SMYY Pays Nov 3, 2026
- KWIN
- SMYY Weekly
Distribution history
KWIN vs SMYY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KWIN SMYY 26.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- KWIN SMYY −1.20
- Worst fall
- KWIN SMYY −38.4%
- Market sensitivity
- KWIN 0.001SMYY 1.06
Popular comparisons
- 0.51% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.