LEGR ranks 3rd and OWNB 20th of 20 funds in the Crypto Industry Stocks Category.
LEGR vs OWNB
LEGR −0.20pt a year
0.65%0.85%
LEGR 1.1×the volume
2.75K2.55K
LEGR vs OWNB Performance
+16.8%−43.6%
- LEGR 0.65%, better
- OWNB 0.85%
- LEGR $124M
- OWNB $13M
- LEGR +16.8%, better
- OWNB −43.6%
- LEGR 1.83%
- OWNB
- LEGR 110
- OWNB 24
- LEGR 2.75K sh, better
- OWNB 2.55K sh
- LEGR $65.02
- OWNB $16.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LEGR | OWNB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55Higher | F13 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A90Higher | D26 |
| Tradability | D39Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | A89Higher | D29 |
| Durability | A79Higher | D36 |
Rank among Crypto Industry Stocks funds
Same Category. LEGR and OWNB are both graded against the same 20 Crypto Industry Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LEGRB
OWNBF
In short
LEGR Blockchain, hold the coins. LEGR has tracked the Indxx Blockchain Index since January 2018, owning roughly 110 global companies that build with the technology or stand to benefit from it, rather than the tokens themselves.
OWNB Most crypto equity funds buy the miners and the exchanges. This one buys the balance sheet: public companies holding at least 1,000 bitcoin in treasury, weighted by the coins they own rather than by market cap. Bitwise launched it in 2025 as a first of its kind.
Stated mandate
LEGR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Indxx Blockchain Index before fees and expenses. The index targets companies involved with blockchain technology or positioned to benefit from its use in business processes.
OWNB The fund seeks to track the Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations Index before fees and expenses. The index selects publicly traded companies meeting bitcoin-treasury, size, liquidity, and free-float requirements.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LEGR vs OWNB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LEGR vs OWNB Cost
Overpaying OWNB vs LEGR
$3,482
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LEGR 0.65%
$12,717
OWNB 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LEGR | OWNB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,508 | $345 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $5,706 | $1,266 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $16,199 | $3,482 |
- 0.65%LEGR, cheaper
- 0.85%OWNB
- Middle half of Crypto Industry Stocks funds
- Median 0.66%
LEGR 8th cheapest of 20 funds
OWNB 16th cheapest of 20 funds
LEGR vs OWNB Dividends
- LEGR 1.83%
- OWNB
- LEGR $1.20
- OWNB
- LEGR $0.18
- OWNB $0.19
- LEGR Sep 24, 2026
- OWNB Dec 8, 2025
- LEGR Sep 30, 2026
- OWNB Dec 10, 2025
- LEGR Quarterly
- OWNB Irregular
Distribution history
LEGR vs OWNB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LEGR 11.7%OWNB 53.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- LEGR 1.59OWNB −0.06
- Worst fall
- LEGR −31.5%OWNB −59.5%
- Market sensitivity
- LEGR 0.90OWNB 3.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.52%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.52%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.