LGLV ranks 1st and SMMV 7th of 16 funds in the US Low Volatility Index Category.
LGLV vs SMMV
LGLV −0.08pt a year
0.12%0.20%
LGLV 3.2×the volume
27K8.49K
LGLV +3.3pt
+12.2%+8.9%
LGLV vs SMMV Performance
+47.0%+30.1%
- LGLV 0.12%, better
- SMMV 0.20%
- LGLV $1.23B
- SMMV $285M
- LGLV +13.1%, better
- SMMV +12.7%
- LGLV 2.03%, better
- SMMV 1.57%
- LGLV 174
- SMMV 358
- LGLV 27K sh, better
- SMMV 8.49K sh
- LGLV $193.47
- SMMV $47.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LGLV | SMMV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | C50 |
| Mission | A93 | A95Higher |
| Risk | C54Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | A81Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | C51 | B68Higher |
| Durability | A74Higher | B58 |
Rank among US Low Volatility Index funds
Same Category. LGLV and SMMV are both graded against the same 16 US Low Volatility Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LGLVA
SMMVB
In short
LGLV Most low-vol funds run an optimizer. LGLV just ranks the biggest 1,000 US stocks by how calm they have been and gives the quietest ones the heaviest weights, for 0.12% a year.
SMMV BlackRock's minimum-volatility playbook aimed at the jumpiest corner of the US market. Instead of picking the calmest stocks one by one, SMMV tracks an index that optimizes an entire small-cap portfolio for the lowest expected risk.
Stated mandate
LGLV The fund is designed to provide exposure to U.S. large-capitalization equities selected through a low-volatility index strategy.
SMMV The fund seeks to track a small-cap U.S. equity index designed around lower-volatility characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LGLV vs SMMV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LGLV vs SMMV Cost
Overpaying SMMV vs LGLV
$1,635
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LGLV 0.12%
$2,520
SMMV 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LGLV | SMMV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $365 | $145 |
| 20 | $859 | $1,421 | $562 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $4,155 | $1,635 |
- 0.12%LGLV, cheaper
- 0.20%SMMV
- Middle half of US Low Volatility Index funds
- Median 0.20%
LGLV 2nd cheapest of 16 funds
SMMV 8th cheapest of 16 funds
LGLV vs SMMV Dividends
- LGLV 2.03%, better
- SMMV 1.57%
- LGLV $3.88
- SMMV $0.74
- LGLV $0.99
- SMMV $0.18
- LGLV Sep 21, 2026
- SMMV Sep 15, 2026
- LGLV Sep 23, 2026
- SMMV Sep 18, 2026
- LGLV Quarterly
- SMMV Quarterly
Distribution history
LGLV vs SMMV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LGLV
- SMMV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LGLV 11.8%SMMV 11.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- LGLV 0.86SMMV 0.88, better
- Worst fall
- LGLV −17.5%, betterSMMV −18.0%
- Market sensitivity
- LGLV 0.48SMMV 0.50
LGLV and SMMV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
