QLV ranks 2nd and SMMV 7th of 16 funds in the US Low Volatility Index Category.
QLV vs SMMV
QLV −0.12pt a year
0.08%0.20%
QLV 1.05×the volume
8.88K8.49K
QLV +4.4pt
+9.8%+5.4%
QLV vs SMMV Performance
+59.7%+30.1%
- QLV 0.08%, better
- SMMV 0.20%
- QLV $193M
- SMMV $285M
- QLV +15.5%, better
- SMMV +12.7%
- QLV 1.45%
- SMMV 1.57%, better
- QLV 123
- SMMV 358
- QLV 8.88K sh, better
- SMMV 8.49K sh
- QLV $83.06
- SMMV $47.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLV | SMMV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | C50 |
| Mission | A76 | A95Higher |
| Risk | A85Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | B67Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | D33 | B68Higher |
| Durability | D31 | B58Higher |
Rank among US Low Volatility Index funds
Same Category. QLV and SMMV are both graded against the same 16 US Low Volatility Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLVA
SMMVB
In short
QLV Low vol with a quality gate: the index cuts the weakest-scoring fifth of US large and mid caps, then optimizes what's left for calm. Fee is 0.08% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
SMMV BlackRock's minimum-volatility playbook aimed at the jumpiest corner of the US market. Instead of picking the calmest stocks one by one, SMMV tracks an index that optimizes an entire small-cap portfolio for the lowest expected risk.
Stated mandate
QLV The fund seeks to track the Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index and provide exposure to U.S. companies selected for lower overall volatility and quality characteristics.
SMMV The fund seeks to track a small-cap U.S. equity index designed around lower-volatility characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLV vs SMMV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLV vs SMMV Cost
Overpaying SMMV vs QLV
$2,466
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLV 0.08%
$1,689
SMMV 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLV | SMMV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $365 | $218 |
| 20 | $575 | $1,421 | $846 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $4,155 | $2,466 |
- 0.08%QLV, cheaper
- 0.20%SMMV
- Middle half of US Low Volatility Index funds
- Median 0.20%
QLV cheapest of 16 funds
SMMV 8th cheapest of 16 funds
QLV vs SMMV Dividends
- QLV 1.45%
- SMMV 1.57%, better
- QLV $1.18
- SMMV $0.74
- QLV $0.28
- SMMV $0.18
- QLV Sep 18, 2026
- SMMV Sep 15, 2026
- QLV Sep 24, 2026
- SMMV Sep 18, 2026
- QLV Quarterly
- SMMV Quarterly
Distribution history
QLV vs SMMV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLV
- SMMV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLV 8.6%, betterSMMV 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- QLV 1.56, betterSMMV 0.88
- Worst fall
- QLV −17.9%, betterSMMV −18.0%
- Market sensitivity
- QLV 0.58SMMV 0.50
QLV and SMMV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
