LGLV ranks 1st and XMLV 13th of 16 funds in the US Low Volatility Index Category.
LGLV vs XMLV
LGLV −0.13pt a year
0.12%0.25%
LGLV 1.3×the volume
26.6K20.6K
LGLV +3.9pt
+11.9%+8.0%
LGLV vs XMLV Performance
+45.7%+35.7%
- LGLV 0.12%, better
- XMLV 0.25%
- LGLV $1.2B
- XMLV $725M
- LGLV +11.7%, better
- XMLV +10.2%
- LGLV 2.06%
- XMLV 3.02%, better
- LGLV 174
- XMLV 82
- LGLV 26.6K sh, better
- XMLV 20.6K sh
- LGLV $187.96
- XMLV $66.01
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LGLV | XMLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | D30 |
| Mission | A93Higher | A78 |
| Risk | C44Higher | D31 |
| Tradability | A82Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | C52Higher | D35 |
| Durability | A74Higher | B64 |
Rank among US Low Volatility Index funds
Same Category. LGLV and XMLV are both graded against the same 16 US Low Volatility Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LGLVA
XMLVC
In short
LGLV Most low-vol funds run an optimizer. LGLV just ranks the biggest 1,000 US stocks by how calm they have been and gives the quietest ones the heaviest weights, for 0.12% a year.
Stated mandate
LGLV The fund is designed to provide exposure to U.S. large-capitalization equities selected through a low-volatility index strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LGLV vs XMLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LGLV vs XMLV Cost
Overpaying XMLV vs LGLV
$2,639
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LGLV 0.12%
$2,520
XMLV 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LGLV | XMLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $455 | $235 |
| 20 | $859 | $1,769 | $910 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $5,159 | $2,639 |
- 0.12%LGLV, cheaper
- 0.25%XMLV
- Middle half of US Low Volatility Index funds
- Median 0.20%
LGLV 2nd cheapest of 16 funds
XMLV 10th cheapest of 16 funds
LGLV vs XMLV Dividends
- LGLV 2.06%
- XMLV 3.02%, better
- LGLV $3.88
- XMLV $2.00
- LGLV $0.99
- XMLV $0.50
- LGLV Sep 21, 2026
- XMLV Sep 21, 2026
- LGLV Sep 23, 2026
- XMLV Sep 25, 2026
- LGLV Quarterly
- XMLV Quarterly
Distribution history
LGLV vs XMLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LGLV
- XMLV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LGLV 11.8%, betterXMLV 12.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- LGLV 0.86, betterXMLV 0.78
- Worst fall
- LGLV −17.5%XMLV −16.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- LGLV 0.48XMLV 0.55
LGLV and XMLV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
