LGLV ranks 1st and XSLV 14th of 16 funds in the US Low Volatility Index Category.
LGLV vs XSLV
LGLV −0.13pt a year
0.12%0.25%
LGLV 2.6×the volume
26.6K10.1K
LGLV +6.4pt
+11.9%+5.5%
LGLV vs XSLV Performance
+45.7%+16.6%
- LGLV 0.12%, better
- XSLV 0.25%
- LGLV $1.2B
- XSLV $236M
- LGLV +11.7%
- XSLV +16.0%, better
- LGLV 2.06%
- XSLV 2.41%, better
- LGLV 174
- XSLV 119
- LGLV 26.6K sh, better
- XSLV 10.1K sh
- LGLV $187.96
- XSLV $50.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LGLV | XSLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | D30 |
| Mission | A93Higher | A73 |
| Risk | C44Higher | F21 |
| Tradability | A82Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | C52 | B61Higher |
| Durability | A74Higher | C47 |
Rank among US Low Volatility Index funds
Same Category. LGLV and XSLV are both graded against the same 16 US Low Volatility Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LGLVA
XSLVC
In short
LGLV Most low-vol funds run an optimizer. LGLV just ranks the biggest 1,000 US stocks by how calm they have been and gives the quietest ones the heaviest weights, for 0.12% a year.
XSLV Low volatility is mostly a large-cap trade. XSLV runs the same screen down in the small-cap weeds, holding about 120 of the calmest names in the S&P SmallCap 600 and giving the steadiest ones the biggest slots.
Stated mandate
LGLV The fund is designed to provide exposure to U.S. large-capitalization equities selected through a low-volatility index strategy.
XSLV The fund seeks to provide US small-cap equity exposure while emphasizing stocks with comparatively low realized volatility. It tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index and is intended to offer potential upside participation with risk mitigation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LGLV vs XSLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LGLV vs XSLV Cost
Overpaying XSLV vs LGLV
$2,639
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LGLV 0.12%
$2,520
XSLV 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LGLV | XSLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $455 | $235 |
| 20 | $859 | $1,769 | $910 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $5,159 | $2,639 |
- 0.12%LGLV, cheaper
- 0.25%XSLV
- Middle half of US Low Volatility Index funds
- Median 0.20%
LGLV 2nd cheapest of 16 funds
XSLV 10th cheapest of 16 funds
LGLV vs XSLV Dividends
- LGLV 2.06%
- XSLV 2.41%, better
- LGLV $3.88
- XSLV $1.22
- LGLV $0.99
- XSLV $0.47
- LGLV Sep 21, 2026
- XSLV Sep 21, 2026
- LGLV Sep 23, 2026
- XSLV Sep 25, 2026
- LGLV Quarterly
- XSLV Quarterly
Distribution history
LGLV vs XSLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LGLV
- XSLV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LGLV 11.8%, betterXSLV 14.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- LGLV 0.86, betterXSLV 0.59
- Worst fall
- LGLV −17.5%, betterXSLV −24.7%
- Market sensitivity
- LGLV 0.48XSLV 0.59
LGLV and XSLV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
