Skip to content

SMLV vs XSLV

State Street SPDR US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF

SMLVBNYSE Arca

Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF

XSLVCNYSE Arca

Overlap

16.6%by weight

Expense ratio

SMLV −0.13pt a year

SMLV0.12%XSLV0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

XSLV 2.9×the volume

SMLV3.51KXSLV10.1K

10Y return · a year

SMLV +4.8pt

SMLV+10.3%XSLV+5.5%

SMLV vs XSLV Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+52.2%SMLV+16.6%XSLV

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. SMLV +52.2%. XSLV +16.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
SMLV 0.12%, better
XSLV 0.25%
Fund size
SMLV $260M
XSLV $236M
1Y total return
SMLV +25.8%, better
XSLV +16.0%
Yield (12M)
SMLV 2.34%
XSLV 2.41%, better
Holdings
SMLV 393
XSLV 119
Avg volume (30D)
SMLV 3.51K sh
XSLV 10.1K sh, better
NAV per share
SMLV $156.67
XSLV $50.85
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SMLV: Cost 90, Risk 40, Mission 69, Tradability 49, Holdings 79, Durability 53. XSLV: Cost 30, Risk 21, Mission 73, Tradability 27, Holdings 61, Durability 47.
Pillar letters and Scores for SMLV, XSLV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSMLVXSLV
Cost30% weightA90HigherD30
Mission25% weightB69A73Higher
Risk15% weightC40HigherF21
Tradability15% weightC49HigherD27
Holdings10% weightA79HigherB61
Durability5% weightC53HigherC47

Rank among US Low Volatility Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SMLV and XSLV are both graded against the same 16 US Low Volatility Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Low Volatility Index⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

SMLV ranks 4th and XSLV 14th of 16 funds in the US Low Volatility Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ALGLVState Street SPDR US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 2AQLVNorthern Trust US Quality Low Volatility ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3AUSMViShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 4BSMLVState Street SPDR US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETFScore 68
  5. Rank 5BONEVState Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETFScore 67
  6. Rank 13CXMLVInvesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETFScore 46
  7. Rank 14CXSLVInvesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETFScore 42
  8. Rank 15CQQLVInvesco QQQ Low Volatility ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SMLVBState Street SPDR US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF

XSLVCInvesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF

In short

SMLV Low volatility is usually a large-cap game. SMLV runs the same calm-stocks screen down where the swings actually live: US small caps, roughly 400 of them, for 0.12% a year.

XSLV Low volatility is mostly a large-cap trade. XSLV runs the same screen down in the small-cap weeds, holding about 120 of the calmest names in the S&P SmallCap 600 and giving the steadiest ones the biggest slots.

Stated mandate

SMLV The fund's advertised mandate is exposure to U.S. small-capitalization companies selected for low volatility.

XSLV The fund seeks to provide US small-cap equity exposure while emphasizing stocks with comparatively low realized volatility. It tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index and is intended to offer potential upside participation with risk mitigation.

Why people hold it

  • SMLV Costs 0.12% a year, under the 0.20% median for its low-volatility peer group.
  • The low-vol shelf is stacked with large-cap mandates (USMV, LGLV, ONEV). This one applies the screen to US small caps instead.ssga.com
  • Roughly 400 holdings, so no single small cap steers the fund. It has tracked its index through live markets since 2013.
  • Sits in the upper half of its low-volatility cohort on our overall read.
  • XSLV A rare small-cap version of a large-cap idea: the rest of the low-vol shelf (USMV, LGLV, QLV, FDLO) screens big companies. This one works the S&P SmallCap 600.
  • The rulebook is simple and public: rank the 600 on the past year's price swings, keep the roughly 120 calmest, weight by the inverse of that volatility, re-sort quarterly.invesco.comspglobal.com
  • Live since 2013, so the strategy carries a real record through multiple small-cap drawdowns rather than a backtest. Pays quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • SMLV Thinly traded next to the giants of the category, so the spread you pay at the point of trade matters more here.
  • Low volatility is relative, not absolute. This is still small-cap equity, and it rides rougher than the large-cap min-vol funds it shares a shelf with.
  • Distributions land quarterly, not monthly.
  • XSLV 0.25% a year sits above the typical low-vol ETF, and large-cap rivals undercut it (QLV 0.09%, LGLV 0.12%). You pay up for the small-cap slice.
  • A smaller, lightly traded fund next to the household-name low-vol ETFs, so spreads can be wider. Limit orders earn their keep here.
  • The screen looks only at past price swings, not business quality or sector balance, so the sector mix can sit a long way from a plain small-cap index. Calmer small caps are still small caps.invesco.com

Full SMLV profile⁠

Full XSLV profile⁠

SMLV vs XSLV Holdings

How SMLV and XSLV differ

Overlap by weight

16.6%

Shared holdings make up 42.8% of XSLV and 16.6% of SMLV.

Level by level

  • Holdings48 in both16.6%
  • Sector11 Sectors62.7%
  • Countryby domicile98.6%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in SMLV and XSLV, widest gap first
SectorMore in SMLVMore in XSLV
Real EstateXSLV +20.6 points
FinancialsXSLV +10.7 points
TechnologySMLV +9.2 points
IndustrialsSMLV +8.8 points
Health CareSMLV +8.7 points
UtilitiesXSLV +5.9 points
Consumer DiscretionarySMLV +5.6 points
EnergySMLV +1.9 points
CommunicationSMLV +1.5 points
MaterialsSMLV +1.3 points
Consumer StaplesSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in SMLV and XSLV, widest gap first
CountryMore in SMLVMore in XSLV
United StatesXSLV +1.4 points
Other countries (7)SMLV +1.4 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • SMLV6.0%
  • XSLV11.3%

Securities held

  • SMLV391
  • XSLV118

Asset class

SMLV
Equity
XSLV
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in SMLV343
  • In both48
  • Only in XSLV70

Only in SMLV

343 securities, 82.8% of SMLV by weight

  • Safety Insurance Group Inc0.67%
  • Northwestern Energy Group In0.66%
  • Chemed Corp0.57%

Only in XSLV

70 securities, 57.1% of XSLV by weight

  • InvenTrust Properties Corp1.18%
  • Chesapeake Utilities Corp1.07%
  • Northwest Natural Holding Co1.03%

Weight gaps

All 48 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in SMLV and XSLV, widest gap first
HoldingMore in SMLVMore in XSLV
Ltc Properties IncLTCXSLV +0.78 points
Westamerica BancorporationWABCXSLV +0.72 points
Phillips Edison & Company InPECOXSLV +0.71 points
Adt IncADTXSLV +0.69 points
Ellington Financial IncEFCXSLV +0.69 points
Avista CorpAVAXSLV +0.68 points
Balchem CorpBCPCXSLV +0.66 points
Easterly Government PropertiDEAXSLV +0.64 points

All 391 SMLV holdings⁠All 118 XSLV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SMLV vs XSLV Cost

Overpaying XSLV vs SMLV

$2,639

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SMLV 0.12%

    $2,520

  • XSLV 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SMLV 0.12%
  • XSLV 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K051015202530XSLV $5,159SMLV $2,520

Year by year

YearSMLVXSLVOverpaying
10$220$455$235
20$859$1,769$910
30$2,520$5,159$2,639

Expense ratio

  • 0.12%SMLV, cheaper
  • 0.25%XSLV
  • Middle half of US Low Volatility Index funds
  • Median 0.20%

SMLV 2nd cheapest of 16 funds

XSLV 10th cheapest of 16 funds

SMLV vs XSLV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
SMLV 2.34%
XSLV 2.41%, better
Payout (12M)
SMLV $3.63
XSLV $1.22
Last payment
SMLV $0.97
XSLV $0.47
Ex-dividend
SMLV Sep 21, 2026
XSLV Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
SMLV Sep 23, 2026
XSLV Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
SMLV Quarterly
XSLV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

SMLVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll SMLV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.36; Jun 16, 2017 $0.47; Sep 15, 2017 $0.56; Dec 15, 2017 $5.85; Mar 16, 2018 $0.42; Jun 15, 2018 $0.60; Sep 21, 2018 $0.70; Dec 21, 2018 $0.89; Mar 15, 2019 $0.43; Jun 21, 2019 $0.75; Sep 20, 2019 $0.63; Dec 20, 2019 $0.80; Mar 20, 2020 $0.45; Jun 19, 2020 $0.59; Sep 18, 2020 $0.24; Dec 18, 2020 $1.08; Mar 19, 2021 $0.45; Jun 18, 2021 $0.70; Sep 17, 2021 $0.59; Dec 17, 2021 $0.81; Mar 18, 2022 $0.47; Jun 17, 2022 $0.65; Sep 16, 2022 $0.59; Dec 16, 2022 $0.88; Mar 17, 2023 $0.84; Jun 16, 2023 $0.64; Sep 15, 2023 $0.66; Dec 15, 2023 $0.87; Mar 15, 2024 $0.56; Jun 21, 2024 $0.90; Sep 20, 2024 $0.89; Dec 20, 2024 $1.07; Mar 24, 2025 $0.85; Jun 23, 2025 $0.83; Sep 22, 2025 $0.87; Dec 22, 2025 $1.04; Mar 23, 2026 $0.71; Jun 22, 2026 $0.91; Sep 21, 2026 $0.97. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD
XSLVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll XSLV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.04; Jun 16, 2017 $0.25; Sep 18, 2017 $0.18; Dec 18, 2017 $0.38; Mar 19, 2018 $0.10; Jun 18, 2018 $0.26; Sep 24, 2018 $0.28; Dec 24, 2018 $0.52; Mar 18, 2019 $0.04; Jun 24, 2019 $0.46; Sep 23, 2019 $0.25; Dec 23, 2019 $0.48; Mar 23, 2020 $0.47; Jun 22, 2020 $0.16; Sep 21, 2020 $0.19; Dec 21, 2020 $0.19; Mar 22, 2021 $0.16; Jun 21, 2021 $0.13; Sep 20, 2021 $0.10; Dec 20, 2021 $0.17; Mar 21, 2022 $0.21; Jun 21, 2022 $0.39; Sep 19, 2022 $0.49; Dec 19, 2022 $0.15; Mar 20, 2023 $0.34; Jun 20, 2023 $0.20; Sep 18, 2023 $0.20; Dec 18, 2023 $0.30; Mar 18, 2024 $0.27; Jun 24, 2024 $0.14; Sep 23, 2024 $0.25; Dec 23, 2024 $0.55; Mar 24, 2025 $0.02; Jun 23, 2025 $0.31; Sep 22, 2025 $0.35; Dec 22, 2025 $0.31; Mar 23, 2026 $0.30; Jun 22, 2026 $0.14; Sep 21, 2026 $0.47. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD

SMLV vs XSLV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • SMLV
  • XSLV
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XSLV −24.7% · Oct 2023. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
SMLV 17.2%XSLV 14.3%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
SMLV 0.94, betterXSLV 0.59
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
SMLV −20.4%, betterXSLV −24.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SMLV 0.80XSLV 0.59

SMLV and XSLV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • SMLVBvsLGLVA

    State Street SPDR US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF · State Street SPDR US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XSLVCvsLGLVA

    Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF · State Street SPDR US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMLVBvsQLVA

    State Street SPDR US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF · Northern Trust US Quality Low Volatility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XSLVCvsQLVA

    Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF · Northern Trust US Quality Low Volatility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMLVBvsUSMVA

    State Street SPDR US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF · iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XSLVCvsUSMVA

    Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF · iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.