UNHG ranks 2nd and LINT 54th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
LINT vs UNHG
UNHG −0.20pt a year
0.97%0.77%
UNHG 5.3×the volume
137K726K
LINT vs UNHG Performance
+43.0%+22.2%
- LINT 0.97%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- LINT $54M
- UNHG $63M
- LINT
- UNHG +11.9%
- LINT 10
- UNHG 5
- LINT 137K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- LINT $90.73
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LINT | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | B60Higher |
| Mission | A95Higher | A90 |
| Risk | C54 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | B67 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A74Higher | B66 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. LINT and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LINTB
UNHGA
In short
LINT Two times Intel's daily move, reset every night, from the issuer that made leveraged ETFs a day-trader staple. One stock, one lever, no index to hide behind.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
LINT The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Intel Corporation common shares.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LINT vs UNHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LINT vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying LINT vs UNHG
$3,369
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LINT 0.97%
$18,198
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LINT | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,371 | $341 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $5,205 | $1,238 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $14,829 | $3,369 |
- 0.97%LINT
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
LINT 156th cheapest of 315 funds
LINT vs UNHG Dividends
- LINT $0.54
- UNHG $1.90
- LINT Sep 22, 2026
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- LINT Sep 29, 2026
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- LINT Quarterly
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
LINT vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LINT UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- LINT UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- LINT UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- LINT 5.43UNHG 5.53
LINT and UNHG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
