PANG ranks 3rd and LINT 54th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
LINT vs PANG
PANG −0.21pt a year
0.97%0.76%
LINT 3.1×the volume
137K44.6K
LINT vs PANG Performance
+43.0%+183.4%
- LINT 0.97%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- LINT $54M
- PANG $9M
- LINT
- PANG +91.6%
- LINT 10
- PANG 4
- LINT 137K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- LINT $90.73
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LINT | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A95Higher | A94 |
| Risk | C54 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | B67 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A74Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. LINT and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LINTB
PANGA
In short
LINT Two times Intel's daily move, reset every night, from the issuer that made leveraged ETFs a day-trader staple. One stock, one lever, no index to hide behind.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
LINT The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Intel Corporation common shares.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LINT vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LINT vs PANG Cost
Overpaying LINT vs PANG
$3,542
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LINT 0.97%
$18,198
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LINT | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,353 | $359 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $5,142 | $1,301 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $14,656 | $3,542 |
- 0.97%LINT
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
LINT 156th cheapest of 315 funds
LINT vs PANG Dividends
- LINT $0.54
- PANG $1.30
- LINT Sep 22, 2026
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- LINT Sep 29, 2026
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- LINT Quarterly
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
LINT vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LINT PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- LINT PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- LINT PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- LINT 5.43PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
