TSMG ranks 1st and LITX 111th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
LITX vs TSMG
0.0%by weight
TSMG −0.73pt a year
1.49%0.76%
LITX 44.8×the volume
3.09M69K
LITX vs TSMG Performance
+9.2%−4.6%
- LITX 1.49%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- LITX $216M
- TSMG $28M
- LITX
- TSMG +40.8%
- LITX 2
- TSMG 5
- LITX 3.09M sh, better
- TSMG 69K sh
- LITX $23.24
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LITX | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A79 | A79 |
| Risk | B55 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | A87Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B67 | B67 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. LITX and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LITXC
TSMGA
In short
LITX One stock, one day. LITX aims to deliver about two times the daily move of Lumentum Holdings shares, before fees. No basket, no hedge, no diversification, and the math resets every session.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
LITX The fund seeks daily investment results corresponding to approximately two times the daily performance of Lumentum Holdings, Inc. common shares, before fees and expenses, for a single trading day.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LITX vs TSMG Holdings
How LITX and TSMG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of LITX and 0.0% of TSMG.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for LITX and TSMG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for LITX.
Concentration
- LITX106.7%
- TSMG212.4%
- LITX2
- TSMG1
Asset class
- LITX
- Leveraged/Inverse
- TSMG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in LITX2
- In both0
- Only in TSMG1
Only in LITX
2 securities, 100% of LITX by weight
- Cfd Lumentum Holdings Inc57.81%
- Cashusd48.87%
Only in TSMG
1 security, 12.4% of TSMG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204012.41%
Weight gaps
LITX and TSMG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LITX vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying LITX vs TSMG
$11,485
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LITX 1.49%
$26,141
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LITX | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,574 | $1,353 | $1,221 |
| 20 | $9,464 | $5,142 | $4,322 |
| 30 | $26,141 | $14,656 | $11,485 |
- 1.49%LITX
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
LITX 263rd cheapest of 315 funds
LITX vs TSMG Dividends
- LITX None
- TSMG
- LITX
- TSMG $2.73
- LITX
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- LITX
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- LITX
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
LITX vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LITX TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- LITX TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- LITX TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- LITX 1.11TSMG 3.81
Popular comparisons
- 1.49% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.