PANG ranks 3rd and LLYX 92nd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
LLYX vs PANG
0.0%by weight
PANG −0.73pt a year
1.49%0.76%
LLYX 7.5×the volume
333K44.6K
LLYX vs PANG Performance
+108.4%+76.3%
- LLYX 1.49%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- LLYX $92M
- PANG $9M
- LLYX +108.4%, better
- PANG +76.3%
- LLYX 9
- PANG 4
- LLYX 333K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- LLYX $35.62
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LLYX | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A73 | A94Higher |
| Risk | A84Higher | A74 |
| Tradability | A79Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A81Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. LLYX and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LLYXC
PANGA
In short
LLYX A one-stock geared trade: LLYX uses swaps to chase twice Eli Lilly's daily move, reset every session. Live since 2024, it is the pricier of the two leveraged LLY funds at 1.49%.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
LLYX The fund seeks daily leveraged returns equal to twice the daily percentage change in Eli Lilly and Company’s share price.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LLYX vs PANG Holdings
How LLYX and PANG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of LLYX and 0.0% of PANG.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for LLYX and PANG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in LLYXMore in PANG | LLYX | PANG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- LLYX270.6%
- PANG210.1%
- LLYX2
- PANG1
Asset class
- LLYX
- Leveraged/Inverse
- PANG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in LLYX2
- In both0
- Only in PANG1
Only in LLYX
2 securities, 70.1% of LLYX by weight
- United States Treasury Bill 11/19/202662.81%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20317.33%
Only in PANG
1 security, 10.0% of PANG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204010.04%
Weight gaps
LLYX and PANG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LLYX vs PANG Cost
Overpaying LLYX vs PANG
$11,485
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LLYX 1.49%
$26,141
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LLYX | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,574 | $1,353 | $1,221 |
| 20 | $9,464 | $5,142 | $4,322 |
| 30 | $26,141 | $14,656 | $11,485 |
- 1.49%LLYX
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
LLYX 263rd cheapest of 315 funds
LLYX vs PANG Dividends
- LLYX $0.70
- PANG $1.30
- LLYX Dec 30, 2025
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- LLYX Dec 31, 2025
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- LLYX Irregular
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
LLYX vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LLYX 74.1%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- LLYX 0.39PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- LLYX −68.0%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- LLYX 0.60PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.49% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.