PANG ranks 3rd and LMTL 78th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
LMTL vs PANG
PANG −0.31pt a year
1.07%0.76%
PANG 1.9×the volume
22.9K44.6K
LMTL vs PANG Performance
+48.3%+76.3%
- LMTL 1.07%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- LMTL $8M
- PANG $9M
- LMTL +48.3%
- PANG +76.3%, better
- LMTL 3.35%
- PANG
- LMTL 10
- PANG 4
- LMTL 22.9K sh
- PANG 44.6K sh, better
- LMTL $44.71
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LMTL | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | A83Higher | A74 |
| Tradability | C42 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B65Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. LMTL and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LMTLC
PANGA
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LMTL vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LMTL vs PANG Cost
Overpaying LMTL vs PANG
$5,159
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LMTL 1.07%
$19,815
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LMTL | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,881 | $1,353 | $528 |
| 20 | $7,046 | $5,142 | $1,904 |
| 30 | $19,815 | $14,656 | $5,159 |
- 1.07%LMTL
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
LMTL 213th cheapest of 315 funds
LMTL vs PANG Dividends
- LMTL 3.35%
- PANG
- LMTL $1.53
- PANG
- LMTL $0.27
- PANG $1.30
- LMTL Sep 22, 2026
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- LMTL Sep 29, 2026
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- LMTL Quarterly
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
LMTL vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LMTL 95.9%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- LMTL 0.81PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- LMTL −50.1%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- LMTL −0.88PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.07% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.