TSMG ranks 1st and LNOK 116th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
LNOK vs TSMG
0.0%by weight
TSMG −0.54pt a year
1.30%0.76%
LNOK 3.8×the volume
265K69K
LNOK vs TSMG Performance
−30.3%−7.6%
- LNOK 1.30%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- LNOK $14M
- TSMG $28M
- LNOK
- TSMG +36.4%
- LNOK 9
- TSMG 5
- LNOK 265K sh, better
- TSMG 69K sh
- LNOK $10.59
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LNOK | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D32 | A70Higher |
| Mission | B66 | A79Higher |
| Risk | B57 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | C43 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B62 | B67Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. LNOK and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LNOKC
TSMGA
In short
LNOK The first 2x daily long ETF on Nokia, a 5G and network-gear name in a field crowded with AI chip tickers. Swaps plus short-dated options, reset every day, 1.30% a year, no margin account to open.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
LNOK The fund seeks leveraged long exposure to NOK, targeting twice the underlying's daily performance.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LNOK vs TSMG Holdings
How LNOK and TSMG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of LNOK and 0.0% of TSMG.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for LNOK and TSMG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in LNOKMore in TSMG | LNOK | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- LNOK291.7%
- TSMG214.6%
- LNOK2
- TSMG1
Asset class
- LNOK
- Leveraged/Inverse
- TSMG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in LNOK2
- In both0
- Only in TSMG1
Only in LNOK
2 securities, 91.4% of LNOK by weight
- United States Treasury Bill 11/19/202688.20%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20313.19%
Only in TSMG
1 security, 14.6% of TSMG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204014.59%
Weight gaps
LNOK and TSMG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LNOK vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying LNOK vs TSMG
$8,713
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LNOK 1.30%
$23,369
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LNOK | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,263 | $1,353 | $910 |
| 20 | $8,393 | $5,142 | $3,251 |
| 30 | $23,369 | $14,656 | $8,713 |
- 1.30%LNOK
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
LNOK 229th cheapest of 315 funds
LNOK vs TSMG Dividends
- LNOK None
- TSMG
- LNOK
- TSMG $2.73
- LNOK
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- LNOK
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- LNOK
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
LNOK vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LNOK TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- LNOK TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- LNOK TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- LNOK 9.37TSMG 3.81
Popular comparisons
- 1.30% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.30% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.30% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.