PSMO ranks 1st and LOCT 14th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
LOCT vs PSMO
PSMO −0.30pt a year
0.79%0.49%
PSMO 3.7×the volume
1.99K7.3K
PSMO +6.7pt
+5.9%+12.6%
LOCT vs PSMO Performance
+5.4%+10.0%
- LOCT 0.79%
- PSMO 0.49%, better
- LOCT $11M
- PSMO $116M
- LOCT +5.4%
- PSMO +10.0%, better
- LOCT 5.66%
- PSMO
- LOCT 12
- PSMO 3
- LOCT 1.99K sh
- PSMO 7.3K sh, better
- LOCT $23.78
- PSMO $33.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LOCT | PSMO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A70Higher |
| Mission | D34 | A95Higher |
| Risk | B68Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | B56 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C51 | B66Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. LOCT and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LOCTC
PSMOB
In short
LOCT Most buffer funds trade your upside for a capped shot at growth. LOCT trades it for income: a defined distribution rate paid monthly, with the first 15% of SPY's losses absorbed over each 12-month outcome period.
PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.
Stated mandate
LOCT The Fund seeks performance equal to its Defined Distribution Rate for each Outcome Period while protecting against the first 15% of SPY losses during each 12-month Outcome Period.
PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LOCT vs PSMO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LOCT vs PSMO Cost
Overpaying LOCT vs PSMO
$5,382
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LOCT 0.79%
$15,174
PSMO 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LOCT | PSMO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $883 | $522 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $3,394 | $1,937 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $9,792 | $5,382 |
- 0.79%LOCT
- 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds
LOCT 24th cheapest of 51 funds
LOCT vs PSMO Dividends
- LOCT 5.66%
- PSMO
- LOCT $1.35
- PSMO None
- LOCT $0.11
- PSMO
- LOCT Oct 30, 2026
- PSMO
- LOCT Pays Nov 2, 2026
- PSMO
- LOCT Monthly
- PSMO
Distribution history
LOCT vs PSMO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LOCT 1.7%, betterPSMO 5.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- LOCT 0.78PSMO 1.31, better
- Worst fall
- LOCT −4.7%PSMO −9.8%
- Market sensitivity
- LOCT 0.11PSMO 0.41
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.